this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
34 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

35121 readers
138 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

So cloudflare admits they are bulk processing the reports and the article just goes saying yeah too bad, it happens. But this is just for me a solid argument that scaling companies to that level is not beneficial, neither for themselves (as they get this kind of coverage about not doing the job properly), then for the websites being unjustly blocked and for visitors being misguided. I wish we could have a more competitive market instead of cloudflare, google and possibly some few others...

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't this exact thing just happen to itch.io?

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, that was an AI "BrandShield" complaining about "fraud & phishing" at Itch.io registrar (iwantmyname), who then ignored their response to those claims.

Similar thing here, but with itch we know it was some lazy ass company trusting on AI, and a shitty domain registrar failing to listen to its customers. Cloudflare provides techdirt with other services (afaik), and didn't entirely remove the website. Plus, they responded within a reasonable timeframe.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just meant a company trusted a bogus phising claim and took down a legitimate site. Yeah, they're a little different though.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Companies would rather protect themselves from potential litigation than stand up for their paying customers so yeah most companies probably just preemptively block the site as soon as the abuse report comes in. They're not really under any obligation to actually check that the abuse report was correct or not, so most companies have decided to cut positions/funding to any sort of complaint review department which is why they can be so slow/unhelpful/incompetent most of the time.