this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1014 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

31946 readers
636 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla released their studies, and I'm seeing a growing number of posts on the Internet about cars and the privacy nightmare they entail. I remember how this issue wasn't talked about earlier because "just buy an older car" was still prevalent. I'm so happy that people are taking notice. Thank you to this community and Mozilla for the work they are putting in!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 121 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

I'm basically in the position that I'm driving a car from 1999, and when it finally dies, I'll either be resigned to riding the bus or finding another aged used car without all this absolute bullshit in it.

Maybe it really is time for the Free Open Source Vehicle.

[–] Tau@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Get ready for the Pine Car

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

I mean.... I'd buy one. Already got a Pinecil.

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You don't need a very old car, just one that is old enough the cellular network doesn't work any more.

Some vehicles were made for 3g, and can't go to 4g for example.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Just put a faraday cage around the antenna.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Maybe it really is time for the Free Open Source Vehicle.

Sure, but what it is for certain time for is making this sort of spying and tracking illegal. If I as a private citizen tracked someone this much, it would be considered stalking, which is a criminal offense.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Getting a base model can somewhat help too. My 2020 car only has carplay. No built in navigation or any remote or homing tech (that I know of). It’s the higher trims that get all the fancy tech “features”.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Oh my god, no. No, no, no.

Just because they aren't making those features available to you doesn't mean they aren't still tracking all that stuff.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm sure !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml would be happy to welcome you if you decided to go with buses.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

That's kinda extreme lol but I hope that companies start selling non smart cars. I don't want my car to be smart , I want my car to take me to point A and B , and be able to fix it myself.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I miss my old 1999 Grand Marquis. Plenty of power, stupid easy to work on, rode like a dream, no tech bullshit. Fuel mileage was pretty crappy (owing to the V8 and curb weight) but it was a solid car. I largely drive cars until the die (did with that one too) and am thinking forward I may do the same and try to find older vehicles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 67 points 1 year ago
[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago
[–] Adda@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People are starting to comment on the topic and take notice? That is great to hear. It is not often that this happens when such a study is released. It might be that ordinary people who lack the knowledge on the subject may be able to comprehend the concerns regarding privacy in cars more readily than in other areas. Whatever the case is, I'm happy the discussion is finally happening.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huge props to Mozilla on this one - their article is clear and thorough. A lot of the studies are very vague, limited in scope, or way too technical, which makes them hard to share and discuss broadly.

[–] Adda@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is true and might be the reason the study is successful at raising public awareness about the topic.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it also has a little bit of shock factor. Everyone expects Google to be spying on you, so nobody is surprised when a report is released about a Google Home speaker being bad for privacy. When you’re buying the speaker, you’re making an active choice to trade privacy for convenience.

But the average person probably doesn’t expect that from their vehicle. I think lots of people are shocked to find out how much info their car has been collecting about them. Especially since cars aren’t usually considered a luxury in the US. To make the same comparison, a smart speaker is a luxury. You can opt out of the data collection by refusing to purchase one. You can do without it. But in most of the US, a car is a necessity, and this means that you can’t opt out of the data collection because you need a car to survive.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also, while Google collecting data on you means they use it for advertising, your vehicle collecting driving data on you absolutely can and will be eventually used for insurance coverage. Insurance companies are absolutely salivating at being able to prove people's bad driving habits with data and use those as ways to increase the cost of their coverage.

Not loving the idea of being spied on by the insurance company dickbags just so they can look for any amount of "bad driving" as an excuse to pump up my rates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jmr@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm waiting for Elon to release a dumb tweet (xeet?) about how tesla has zero data collection

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Things are making more sense now lol

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Are those sort of lies from a company's CEO punishable by fine or perhaps prison, or is flat-out lying about your company in a public statement totally cool, totally legal nowadays?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm not sure how much it matters that people are taking notice. If all cars are doing it, what can we do? It's not like people can't buy cars anymore and it's not like individual people can pay off politicians to make it illegal like large corporations can to make it legal.

[–] activ8r@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

There are a few options I guess. If enough people notice then there may be more money in being the company that respects privacy and just charges more for the car up front.
It might even encourage more people to buy used instead of new.
Or some people might just decide they don't need a car.

Caring is the first step to actively doing something. The more people that know, the more that will care and the more people that will act. Gotta start somewhere.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

The more people who notice, the more who care. The more who care, the more capital to be gained by proposing and / or supporting regulation.

We won't get free healthcare (in the states) or housing, but this is something trivial enough that I could see politicians making a play.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Ever since Jeep released their current gen Cherokee and two hackers revealed that they could hack into the entirety of the car by just knowing the phone number of the car's hotspot, I have avoided new cars like the plague

[–] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

maybe I'm a little behind the times when it comes to cars, but shouldn't it be relatively trivial on the community scale to create foss head unit OS's? are there other components that phone home besides the head unit? most cars have replaceable head units anyway, right? I feel like I must be missing something here

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 35 points 1 year ago

Head units are no longer a seperate component.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well… No. Head units are pretty much integrated units nowadays. That transition started back in the 2000’s, and pretty much any car after like 2012-2015 is going to have a fully integrated head unit. Unless the FOSS unit is custom made for the car, replacing the head unit would severely impact the car’s functionality. It’s not as easy as just wiring a power and audio cable in, and it hasn’t been for about a decade.

Ironically, I don’t even think that was the reason for making integrated head units. I think auto manufacturers realized that touch screens and PCBs were cheaper to mass produce and install. Analog control systems fell out of favor because they require a team of techs sitting on a manufacturing line wiring them together. But a PCB and touch screen can just be plugged in and screwed in by a single tech.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Feels like any car after around 2000 has an integrated head unit with other controls. Not easy or possible in many cases remove it without impacting the functionality of the car.

Have... you been in a new car in the last 20 years?

[–] yousirname@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How exactly do they collect info other than GPS?

How are people interacting with the "radio" that it's given so much info?

Are new vehicles required to be connected to phone network to function?

What functionality is lost of not connected.

As a motorist who prefers to drive cheap cars that have a little tech as possible so that there is little to go wrong and what goes wrong I can fix myself I know nothing about the latest gen of cars

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cars are mandated to have a "SIM" (I don't know how this is implemented, that's a question for the engineers) inside that can be connected at all times. This was originally meant for faster accident response, and I'm assuming car companies have contracts with the Telecom companies (someone from the engineering/law teams help me here) to transmit data over their networks even when the user's devices are not connected

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And what if the cellular connection "accidentally" breaks and doesn't get fixed?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this. I'm not in USA but I had chatgpt summarize my vehicle manufacturers privacy policy. Its wasn't great, so I sent an email to their privacy inbox. Next, I'll email my politicians.

[–] SeedyOne@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Frankly, I can't believe how many different posts I've seen about that article today. Amazing.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The S in IoT stands for Security

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

My joke but better

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 7 points 1 year ago

lol that's why I don't want a modern car. aside from the sensors in the engine, there's no others, so I'm not concerned about privacy lol

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

That's why I'm glad I have an older car that doesn't have any computer crap in it. I don't want to have to jailbreak my car for it to be usable.

load more comments
view more: next ›