this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
146 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

48677 readers
366 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
146
How do I make this look more normal? (pawb.social)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Cornflake@pawb.social to c/linux@lemmy.ml
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The dark system theme I have set seems to make some applications look funny, with dark boxes where they should be light. Is there any way I can manually set a theme on a per-application basis?

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Partially implimented system theme. Comments: oP MuSt wAnT It tO LoOk lIkE MiCrOsOfT!

The only one who so-far realized the theming is the problem suggested a quick fix that will likely leave this issue cropping up again in other applications.

Me: down-votes comments because I WANT there to be a better answer, not because I know one. Happy Monday, people!

[–] WhyAUsername_1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Happy Monday indeed.

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that other person was answering in good faith. They were trying to help, they just misunderstood what was being asked.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thus, that last line in my comment. My frustration in this case is just sooo much more to do with the issue than with comments.

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't see the point in downvoting someone when they misunderstood something and OP clarified, but perhaps i just don't understand Lemmy.

If anything maybe I'd upvote the reply for visibility.

Anyway you seem nice, please don't take my comments personally. I think the groupmind that gave you a ton of upvotes and that other person a ton of downvotes just rubbed me the wrong way.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Where does this imply that I downvoted anything for the reasons you mentioned? There were maybe five or six comments prior to my own, and I downvoted all of them besides OPs(which I did upvote, tyvm - funny how that didn't work out to you noticing).

Less spammy than "trying to set the record straight" by correcting them all, nevermind that, as I stated, I don't have a better solution anyways, but again, yes, I also up-voted the one-or-two comments that had anything to do with OPs problem, both clarifications by OP themselves.

I've also up-voted other comments since, but there have been none talking about Ribbons and Tabs since, at least. Almost like what visibility my own comment got served its purpose.

Things don't have to be positive to work. Sometimes Loud Garbage can slow the buildup of even-more-useless-if-well-meaning garbage. Well-intentioned, useless, basically-un-true-in-context things only pass one of Socrates criteria, btw.

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

lol ok

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

I guess this may be the problem

Poor flatpak app has no way to see the themes 🥺

[–] fnafdesktopfan111@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I had the same problem. It's been a while but I'm fairly certain the problem can be solved by installed the appropriate integration package. Try installing these packages, libreoffice-plasma libreoffice-qt5 libreoffice-style-breeze. Take a look at this forum thread for more info, https://discuss.kde.org/t/libreoffice-does-not-honour-kde-theme/3347

[–] pollopolis@lemmy.ml 30 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Use another theme, look for them in Tools->Preferences

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, actually, one of the preinstalled themes is activated. Normally you have to pick the option that says something along the lines of "don't use themes" inside Tools/Preferences/LibreOffice/Application_Colors or something (depends on the language). That would make the desktop theme apply properly over LibreOffice.

You might need to reboot LibreOffice to see the changes take effect.

[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago

At least you have the menu bar.

[–] Stewbs@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Normally LibreOffice would pick up on your theme automatically, strange why it's like this. Are you using any different versions of LO? Flatpak version or Appimage? Appimage has a lot of issues with theming.

This one's an easy fix though, just go to Tools > Options > View and pick a theme option, that should work. If that doesn't help then try re-installing or using a different version.

Hope this was helpful!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess it is flatpak, since it is the most popular way to install stuff in fedora. I guess this is the solution, but there most be a more easy way, for sure

Still these things are the reason I stopped installing flatpaks pretty soon after I started 🤭

[–] Stewbs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Strange though, I've never had issues like this with flatpak.... It might be possible ofc that it is flatpak but I suspect it's the theme itself that's faulty. Thanks for providing a solution btw!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think it is because of the container design which prevents flatpak from accessing the theme. It always made problems for me and I was too lazy to tinker with flatseal 😂😅

Maybe the theme is faulty in a way like not compatible with flatpak. Or you always installed themes as flatpak as well.

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This is a common but solvable problem. I'm afk so can't link the right pages, but look up the LibreOffice and/or consistent gtk/qt theming entries on Arch Wiki

Edit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/LibreOffice#Theme might be useful. It also links to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Uniform_look_for_Qt_and_GTK_applications, which is worth looking into as well

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do come back and link it when you can!

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

thanks for the reminder! don't want another potential denvercoder9 situation

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 3 weeks ago

Is it a flatpak installation or repo installation?

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

if you don't find another solution, i have libreoffice installed via flatpak and this issue does not exist

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because the theme doesn't get applied at all or why?

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, stuff on the repos can be broken sometimes on some distros, i recall firefox on fedora with the missing codecs, opensuse and their flaky distrobox (or podman?) implementation.

In my experience, repo versions of software is not totally consistent, even worse when compared to flatpak, if a flatpak breaks, it doesnt break on just ubuntu, or fedora, or arch; it breaks everywhere, and gets fixed everywhere too. Credit where credit is due, small utilities generally tend to have better experience when installed natively, like htop, fish, and some other small programs.

Maybe i'm just a dumb software progressive, but flatpak generally is much more reliable for me than native repo versions of software.

[–] Tundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This video of optimising the layout of libreoffice should be helpful;

https://youtu.be/x44bda1dz84

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

I dont know if this could be your issue, however I had some strange big black shadows arround GTK apps. After trying all different possible themes, playing arround with config files, CSS... Nothing helped.

However, on the Archlinux wiki, they mentioned something interesting: The compositor.

While this really depends what DE and what compositor is installed on your distro by default, I got rid off all the strangeness by enabling something in the compositor.

[–] inutt@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I had this problem, and it was definitely a theme issue.

https://askubuntu.com/a/1372318 may be helpful in setting a theme just for libreoffice, it you're using GTK themes. (Basically, override the GTK_THEME variable in the .desktop file). I haven't tried it myself since I just switched to a different theme.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You can apply the theme in settings I think.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

Try switching to a tabbed layout.