this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
331 points (97.2% liked)

science

14848 readers
973 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In this study, the scientists simulated the process of spaced learning by examining two types of non-brain human cells — one from nerve tissue and one from kidney tissue — in a laboratory setting.

These cells were exposed to varying patterns of chemical signals, akin to the exposure of brain cells to neurotransmitter patterns when we learn new information.

The intriguing part? These non-brain cells also switched on a “memory gene” – the same gene that brain cells activate when they detect information patterns and reorganize their connections to form memories.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValenThyme@reddthat.com 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

fascinating, this concept is a core to the theravadan buddhist practice of vipassana meditation, which is supposed to be what the buddha himself actually taught in his wandering classroom. I always took that bit with a grain of salt assuming it was just an old misunderstanding of what's going on but the kind of non-thought memories appears to be exactly what is described.

it's called Vasana and it's said to be like 'perfume lingering in cloth', the residual karma from our actions that shapes our future and influences automatic actions and preferences. Trauma is said to be stored in the body as well as Sankhara.

I have always viewed vipassana as mental martial arts more than religion, and brushed off all the reincarnation and other inexplicable stuff. fascinating to hear scientists confirming what philosophers came up with thousands of years ago.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago

Isn't this literally the plot to the Reanimator?

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Its like the blockchain for you body.

[–] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Identifier of ownership

[–] KaTaRaNaGa@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

“The Body Keeps the Score”

[–] portuga@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It’s called karma

[–] _bac@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

Its interestng, but kidney cells are not exposed to patterns of neurotransmiters like nerve cells are. Cells can be reprogramed to be stem cells as well with the right pattern od signals but that does not mean that it really happens in the body.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not to be a debbie downer here, but it's important to keep in mind that unless expressly stated otherwise, so-called discoveries that are only published in out-of-the-way (ie. not respected scientific journals) have usually not been peer reviewed or had their results replicated, which is the entire point of the scientific method.

[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 161 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Memory is stored in the balls

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 7 hours ago

Still better that "pee is stored in the brain"

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (14 children)

Just to recap, sperm, pee, microplastics, and memories are stored in the balls? Am I missing anything? I can’t remember. Maybe my balls are too full of microplastics to recall.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 27 points 20 hours ago

I'm sure you could fit a few dollars in loose change in there to.

load more comments (12 replies)

Thanks i actually needed this comment to be here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

Is this the stuff responsible for organ donation receivers picking up traits of the donor?

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

"Muscle memory" is real.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, a handgun also kills cancer in vivo. The problem is the cost to the host body.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but what you're saying is if I hired a good enough marksman to shoot the cancer out of my body without killing me then that's a good thing right?

I mean, that's basically what we do with gamma radiation and chemotherapy, just a little bit more ballistic, right?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly! The only difference is that those use very tiny bullets.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Chemo only applies if it's doped with a radionuclide, otherwise it's just regular poison.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 27 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Its not the same memory as your brain. your life story is not in your non nerve cells. they have memory the same as yeast has memory but everyone is aware of how we have muscle memory in reptitive tasks.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think muscle memory is just a phrase, but the training that makes and embed the "muscle memory" is essentially nural

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 16 hours ago

yeah sorry I still feel that is neural just not all the way to the brain. I guess what I was trying to say if the article is not that cells hold your memory but that they hold their type of memories is a similar way.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of like how there's taste buds in our lungs.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
[–] Liome@pawb.social 34 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Do we need to format our kidneys before becoming a donor now?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 30 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe. There are numerous reports of people having changes in personality after organ transplants.

Personality changes following heart transplantation: The role of cellular memory https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31739081/

https://www.sciencealert.com/eerie-personality-changes-sometimes-happen-after-organ-transplants

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Many stories like this from fecal exchanges (trans-poo-sions)

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

To be fair, I think anyone going through something as traumatic as basically being put into stasis and having their heart cut out and and then having one reattached would change a bit simply because of the process.

I mean, you don't keep stepping on Lego bricks barefoot after you've done so, and we expect people who have had a heart ripped out and then another one reinserted to act the same?...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troed@fedia.io 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

There are many stories on how the receiver of a transplant has felt themselves being "changed", sometimes in ways that would remind people of the donor.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3943/5/1/2

MDPI is like the lowest quality slop journal. Like anything gets peer reviewed in that thing.

load more comments
view more: next ›