this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
428 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am the developer of a project with a small community known as Offflix. Now I recently discovered that Yts has an api, and it is too irresistible for me to integrate it into my project as a simple in app click to download any movie.

So, would doing that and making the code open source be illegal? I am not a US citizen and I am not technically ripping movies, I am just packaging yts's functionality inside my app. Would github flag and destroy me repo if I do this?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] madnerds@lemm.ee 45 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Probably a bad idea. If you really wanted to do it, you should add plug-in support to your main project, then create a separate repo, maybe under a different account, with the potentially illegal yts download plug-in. That way only the plug-in repo would get DMCAed and could be mirrored by other people, or hosted off GitHub.

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 days ago

Like how stremio does it

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

But even if I developed a plug in, for the plug in to work, I would have to bundle a torrent engine and anything that allows movies/series to be downloaded might get flagged I guess

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

The reason they were banned on leetx is because they sold out their user email lists to an anti-piracy law firm which tried to extort money from people. I wouldn’t trust people like that. I especially would be wary of subjecting users to people like that. Torrent freak has coverage if you care to search.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 12 points 4 days ago

I think the way lots of projects handle something like that is to add a plugin system to the main project, and then offer it as a plugin in a different repo.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

GitHub definitely would and has in the past. YouTube-dl is on GitHub and gets a pass because it is used by researchers and archivists, both are fair use. forgejo.org would let you be your own fedi-github and might be worth checking out (could be easier than designing a plugin system and additional repos).

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Codeberg wouldn't mind according to that principle right? I cant fathom how a plug in would work when essentially adding yts would mean bundling a Downloader with a torrent engine and any system that allows downloading movies/series via torrent would get dmca.

[–] thetaT@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

make this functionality into a plugin that you publish under a different account, that way you can have this functionality while maintaining plausible deniability