this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
1028 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

I honestly didn't even know it was still around. The last time I opened it was... Windows 7, I think?

[–] satan_6661@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No wtf microsoft!!

At least there's Notepad++. An absolute end of an era.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Wordpad is the rich text editor, it's not notepad

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@artemis.camp 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get it. MS has a “free” rich text editor, it’s Word online. You can easily install any other simple rich text editor (is abiword still a thing?) on Windows. Wordpad probably has minimal usage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gataloca@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good alternative is abiword. Don't know if it exists on Windows tho.

load more comments (1 replies)

You can add it back to the library from an older edition, and it will run fine if you want it badly enough.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Install Linux, use whatever the hell you like

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] stonedemoman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can see truth to either position presented in these comments, but I don't like being a fence sitter. That being said, I would think making it available but not mandatory would satisfy both opinions, right? Making it unavailable altogether is a move that seems to have an ulterior motive.

[–] Vigge93@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not trying to defend Microsoft, but making it available to the fraction of a fraction that would actually download it is probably not worth it because you still would have to maintain it, making sure it's compatible with new windows versions and providing security updates.

It's a lot easier to just kill it outright, and those that do actually really really want it can find some third party who has uploaded a version of the exe file somewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›