this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
130 points (97.8% liked)

You Should Know

33100 readers
328 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why YSK: Websites on the internet often try to uniquely identify your device, this extension attempts to prevent that and make it hard for them to do so.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbital@infosec.pub 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Firefox's built in "Enhanced Tracking Protection" already does a lot of this work for you, especially if you select "strict mode." Go ahead and try this extension if you prefer. But remember to be selective with the extensions you add to your browser in general, as they also present an opportunity to introduce vulnerabilities.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I tried that and then one of those "how common is your fingerprint" websites said my fingerprint was unique. Literally fucking unique.

I think it was the EFF site.

Might have something to do with other extensions I have installed like Canvas Blocker, uMatrix, etc.

Fuck, even in Mull on my phone where I only have a few extentions installed: uBlock Origin, cookie auto delete, local CDN, and a cookie consent blocker.

[–] orbital@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As you suggested, I suspect it's the rare combination of additional extensions that's contributing to your uniqueness in a fingerprinting sense.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I tried turning them all off and nothing changed. Same result with the Duck Duck Go browser set on Android. Unique fingerprint. And I have no extensions. I wonder if my VPN is part of the fingerprint. I did read a lot of the explanation of what fingerprints you, but I didn't see VPN in there. I should do a search on that page to see.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

LOVE jShelter. Use it on all my devices (woooo mobile firefox addon compatibility!!).

It is an EYE OPENER to see all the websites that will refuse to serve you when they can't identity exactly who you are...

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What I like is that JShelter doesn't try to "hide in the crowd" with its spoofed attributes which is IMO a failing strategy as the crowd increasingly becomes atomized by adtech.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah i get this approach theoretically but i dont think it works but that just a normie opinion.

Like why would not i add privacy badger on top of ublock since ublock passes some stuff like google login pop ups?

The approach once worked, but that was back before browsers began including the likes of things like advertiser IDs and other extremely high entropy attributes that no average person would ever think to disable. Contemporary hide-in-the-crowd strategies are mostly curated within efforts like Tor browser where everyone is encouraged to use the exact same configuration. But then it's still a numbers problem. If only two attendees decide to hide their faces with party masks to a soiree of 100 people, one (large scale observer) only need check the guest list and use process of elimination to determine the identities of the 2% "hidden" attendees.

Somebody can, and probably will, come along and refute this assessment. I am not entirely convinced myself that it is a losing strategy yet. I'm open to hear opposing takes.

Privacy Badger: ~~IIRC Privacy Badger operates by logging third party domains connections on a per-site bases, and only begins to actively block connections once a domain seen across multiple visits fits the profile of a likely tracker.~~

Nvrmnd, they've changed how PB works and it is now closer to a list-based tracker blocker (enumerate badness):

Privacy Badger no longer learns from your browsing by default, as “local learning” may make you more identifiable to websites.

So they've since corrected one of the core issues with PB. Still it is weak. To see why, please glance through The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.

uBlock Origin in advanced mode, with default-deny rules (only allow assets by exception) is going to be much stronger at blocking crap.

Personally, I use uMatrix with pretty much all asset classes blocked by default. I never see popups. I never see banners begging "please allow our cookies, pleeeeaaase!".

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

How do I know it's actually safe to install? Lol

In addition to the code being freely available, as others have pointed out, the developer has attended some number of software conferences at which his knowledge of this subject matter and this project makes itself evident.

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's open source. You can compile from source.

[–] Splashy5928@lemmus.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's open source, you can take a look here: https://pagure.io/JShelter/webextension

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're asking the right questions! @Splashy5928@lemmus.org has the right answer

[–] classic@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the right answer if you know how to read code

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The only alternative is closed-source, which is just "trust me bro". At least with open-source you have the option to check it for yourself. Doesn't have to be a perfect system

[–] classic@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I figure if it's open source someone will have read the code and I can settle for riding that effort

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

That let me sleep easy for twenty Years. Then xz happended. I am uneasy now.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What’s so funny that had you loling?

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

They're just saying it in a jovial, not so serious tone lol. Maybe you should lighten up lol

[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It breaks Cloudflare so for me tons of websites become inaccessible. Maybe you can tweak it but OOTB it's unusable