this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
180 points (95.5% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

6 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Set to release on Nov 22 in major markets for anyone else about to ask in the thread like I almost did instead of just looking it up.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The true hero. Preempting your own well-earned laziness to spare us all the same effort. I thank you.

[–] lou_profile@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The normal cut btw, not the long one mentioned in the title. In case someone, like me, thinks the long will be released in November. Not to downplay your comment though

[–] Roundcat@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just know they are going to attempt the first 24 hour movie in my lifetime.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

24: The Movie

Watch every second of Jack Bauer's day. Probably skip the first 8 hours, it's just a long sleep scene.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Probably skip the first 8 hours

But then you will miss the great snore at 03:35 or the ass scratching at 05:21 or....

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My favorite part is when he gets up seventeen times to use the bathroom.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Prostate problems are a removed.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well now I want to wait for the director's cut to watch.

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like Kingdom of Heaven

[–] ours@lemmy.film 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for the DR of Prometheus where it all makes sense.

Any day now...

[–] LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The movie made sense IMO, its main issues are that so much of the crew are hollow. Their characters are threadbare, they're on screen for the express purpose of dying. Even if we don't pick up on it specifically we pick up on it subconsciously and they feel off. The geologist and biologist that die early on have basically one trait each (biologist is fake tough guy, biologist is nerdy-nervous). They don't feel like real people.

I liked Prometheus a lot, but the very-real problems with it would in my estimation require way more than a director's cut to fix. Unless there's a lot of filmed character development out there, I suppose. The insignificant characters needed to be replaced with a far smaller number of significant characters to join the handful of existing significant characters. Basically requires a rewrite.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Me, an intellectual, wondering whether or not Josephine was the name of the llama, colorized:

Spoiler alert: ::: spoiler The llama was named Tina :::

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

That fat lard.

[–] Jaywarbs@artemis.camp 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A 4.5 hour cut of Napoleon Dynamite directed by Ridley Scott? I’m in.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, like, I had questions but I definitely wasn't complaining

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Make yourself a dang quesadilla!

[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn Napoleon going to be shorter than this cut of the movie.

(Yeah yeah i know he was average height for his time)

[–] panchzila@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Akchua.... Dammit.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A good response to historical inaccuracies found in the trailer from the Waterloo Association: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlbXiYLi1ys

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back in the day, the Soviet Red Army trained 16,000 troops in Napoleonic Era artillery, cavalry, and infantry tactics. They were first used in the Russian movie 'War And Peace.' Hollywood hired them out for 'Waterloo' with Rod Steiger.

If you want to see a great reenactment of the battle, watch that movie. I'm speaking specifically about military tactics.

https://youtu.be/rt4mYUKjzn0

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/rt4mYUKjzn0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Christ, if the video is an hour long how long is the trailer??

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Aha, three minutes I think? There is so much history in that period, that even the appearance and the fact that there is a speaking part for one person in the trailer gives those in the video hope for the movie.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=qlbXiYLi1ys

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] kingthrillgore@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm starting to think Ridley may have lost it.

[–] AlicePraxis@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

idk Ridley, maybe it's great but directors have a lot of hubris in thinking anyone would want to sit through a 4.5 hour film. at that point your best bet is to release it as a miniseries like the extended cut of Hateful Eight

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Releasing Napoleon as a short film would be wrong on multiple levels.

[–] ScorpionFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

4 and a half hours is too long

[–] Zibobwa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many hours of Stranger Things did you watch?

[–] regular_human@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Tbf you don't need to watch a 4.5 hour movie in one go either. Many films used to incorporate intermissions for this very purpose.

[–] Shalakushka@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they could split it up into even more watchable bits, call them "episodes”. It could be like a series. Not like a whole series, maybe some sort of miniature series.

It's OK to make a TV show, Ridley.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why not make it two separate parts, released fairly close together, like a month apart? You'd build up hype and make people want to see the first one before part two comes out, then offer some double feature screenings alongside the normal release to encourage viewings of the second one. It would then also gain a surge in ticket sales as people finally went to see part onento get caught up.

Effectively it would mean a single film taking up twice as many screens and pulling in twice as many tickets.

All of that's assuming it's any good, of course. But I would think by this point with Ridley Scott that's a decent bet.

The key words being used to. We need to bring it back, but I fear that's unlikely

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a theater, yes. But for home video, where people can and often do watch movies in chunks anyway, length doesn't matter as much.

I'd love it if he just dropped it as two films, released a month apart. That would drive people to see the first part so that they can be caught up for part two.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately that likely wouldn't work great. The only people that would be interested in watching part 2 are the people that watched (and liked) part 1. And business is often a numbers game

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's fair. But presumably the same number of people would watch part 1 as would watch the whole thing. And maybe even more, because of the lower time commitment.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wasn’t Kubrick originally going to make this movie?

[–] LeberechtReinhold@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There has been many Napoleon projects, starting with the 1927 silent epic. Kubrick researched a long time for his project but never had time to do it. Spielberg is collaborating with HBO to use that script for a miniseries though.

[–] brsrklf@compuverse.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is it with Spielberg finishing Kubrick's stuff? No disrespect to either, but it's not like their works are very similar.

[–] LeberechtReinhold@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because they were friends (or at least knew each other).

[–] johnthedoe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yea I remember seeing something about that. Wonder if the script ever ended up anywhere. Like how Spielberg ended up directing Ai which was a Kubrick script or idea? I can’t remember.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

Of course Ridley Scott has multiple different cuts.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Will it also be in black and white so you can't tell how bad the effects are?