this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
1015 points (95.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9697 readers
954 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 161 points 2 months ago (9 children)

people should be reminded that posts like these aren't really critical of people for not taking the bus. they're critical of systems and planning that don't make you want to take the bus.

if the bus is always packed people will not want to ride it. that's not on you.

if the bus is unreliable, that's not on you.

if there's no bus or public transit that goes where you want to go out somewhere of a reasonable walking distance, that's not on you.

if where you're going is not walkable in the first place, then taking the bus is pointless since once you arrive you'd need a car anyway.

demanding change however is on you.

it's not like cars are awesome by the way. they're inefficient, pricy, troublesome, there's traffic, parking... it's stressful and it's deadly to boot. if people are not taking the bus, the city has work to do.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

I'm critical of all the people driving over sized SUVs by themselves in NYC when I'm trying to get a loaded box truck though a gridlocked intersection. Even if the city instruction doesn't have mass transit, you do not need Escalade over a commuter car.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

yeah just because you're not riding a bus doesn't mean you should get around with a Gigantus Pollutinator 9000 or a private jet, obviously.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

An SUV in NYC is especially egregious. They could have taken the train from Yonkers, and used the bus/subway. You guys are the one city in the US that actually has decent mass transit.

If you actually live in the city, and own an SUV you are an idiot spending way too much on parking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think (most) cars are awesome but want better public transit because there's way too many people who are terrible drivers.

If driving required licensing like an airplane pilot I'd still get one. And probably enjoy driving more because I could expect people to know how to zipper merge.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 137 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If this is America/Canada while it could be carrying more people the sad truth is that it's probably carrying half a dozen people because it's likely going from one unwalkable neighborhood to another. Especially up here in BC there's a stark difference between downtown buses running between unis, skytrain and the dense core of Vancouver to the ones you'll see in a suburban hell like Burnaby.

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 84 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Or it takes prohibitively longer than a driving.

My wife considered taking the bus to work, but it would take 2 hours to get 20 minutes down the road.

Also add the fact that a bus pass is more expensive than our car insurance.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yea, these are some of the hardest things we need to address to make non-driving more popular in North America - overseas the increased density lends itself a lot more naturally to public transit.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Australian manages pretty good urban public transport, with a much lower density than the US

(Our rural public transport effectively doesn't exist though)

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't know much about Australia, what forms public transportation are implemented over there?

Hope you're having a good day :)

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Our biggest cities normally have bus and train. About half of them have some sort of light rail/tram equivalent too. The coverage isn't completely comprehensive, so it's possible to find suburbs that don't have great coverage, but by and large, it's pretty good. Footpaths and bicycle paths are common too. The cycling infrastructure is often gappy, so you on commutes etc, you can find yourself navigating spaces without dedicated cycling infrastructure, but generally, you can get a good portion of a cycle commute on dedicated bike spaces. The only roads without a pedestrian corridor of some sort are generally major highways

In our smaller and medium cities, the trains are normally inter city, not local, so they're not so much use as public transport, but there are generally buses, though with less coverage. Good pedestrian infrastructure even in smaller cities though. It's harder to survive in smaller cities without a car, but possible.

Once you get out of smaller cities and in to towns and villages though, it gets harder again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Where I recently moved to, everything is a 10-20 min drive away, but buses can be over an hour because how poorly they're done. Apparently they used to be quite bad, but recent changes made them awful and no one understands how the new routes and timetables managed to be approved and implemented.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that's a bummer :-/ For me it's 15-20 min by car assuming a few minutes walk to where I've parked. 25 min by bike (20 min by road but I take a safer 'scenic route') and about 40 min by bus and about 10 minutes of that is walking to/from the bus stop. And the bus fare gets capped at 8 trips per week so every trip thereafter is free meaning if you commute to work every day, Friday and all weekend will be unlimited free trips.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

And the bus fare gets capped at 8 trips per week so every trip thereafter is free meaning if you commute to work every day, Friday and all weekend will be unlimited free trips.

This sounds amazing. Meanwhile where I'm from they recently raised prices again.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

This is a massive part of the problem here in the UK too.

I just checked with Google Maps how long it would take my wife to get to work tomorrow morning. In the car it would take between 45 minutes and an hour, but public transport would take an hour and 52 minutes, with 29 minutes of that taken up by walking to bus and train stops. She would have to leave the house before 5:30 am, whereas the car would give her another hour in bed.

At the moment we're under a yellow warning for rain too, so she would need to take waterproof clothes and probably a change of clothes too.

Until things like this are improved, it's easy to see why lots of people still take the car :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also, more frequent and convenient bus trips probably means less people on board per trip.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 57 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Well, I need to stop by fedex, go the the grocery store, and pick up dry cleaning all before I get home. Then I need to make dinner. So, if the bus takes 1.5 hours and driving takes 15 minutes… the car wins.

We should really say fuck urban sprawl. I’d love to walk to work 🤷

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 39 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I can do all of those things with a 5 minutes walk in my European city. And I don't even live in the city centre.

Mixed zoning and walkable cities are the solution.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ex Londoner here, I can plot that route in my head by walking around Clapham Common station where I used to live.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 14 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Well those things are like in the same mall where the parking absolutely sucks, so bus was way easier.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

My city started a program using taxes to pay for half the bus fares of citizens

So I looked things up.

Going to the nearest grocery store:

35 minutes walk 15 minutes bike ride 6 minutes car trip 90 minutes bus ride somehow

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if there's only two or three things a month that transit is better for, you're gonna get reductions in traffic. It doesn't have to be a full car replacement to be worth bigtime investments.

And it's the only thing that scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Lets assume we disqualify the cars going left ro right, and if we also assume each car only has 1 person per car, that means the cars is 32.

A bus that size is usually built to fit around 50ish people using every seat, but none standing.

I ride my local bus everyday. It's NEVER full like that. I might have 6 people on the bus. Sometimes I'm the only rider.

So, yeah, a bus CAN hold roughly as many prople as cars, (again assuming only 1 person per car, which probably isn't the case 100%), the reality is that's not functionally true.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Even if it's only carrying 6 people it's still doing a better job than the cars which on average probably have 1-2 people in each of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The bus I ride every morning is always so full you struggle to get past the standing people to get to the door. The bus home is usually a little less busy, but I'm currently writing this comment while having to stand on that bus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

tbf, it's only possibly not true because of intentional choices in city design and general social attitudes.

That being said, I live in a pretty shitty area for bus transport (I'm in the USA, no less) and the busses are still usually mostly full when I use them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Badly designed transit is not a condemnation of all public transit. Specially when in most of the world public transit is vastly more occupied than in the US and Canada, by the simple fact of actually connecting places people want to go, where people can then walk around when they get there. Parking lots are not destinations.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I lived in a European capital until 28 and never got a driver's license because public transport was faster than driving through horrible traffic.

Moved to the US and in less than a year had to buy a car because it was impossible to do anything without one. And that was in am area with considerably better public transport than usual for the US. It was just my wife driving, but after a few years I had to get a driver's license too and buy a second car. I like walking, I prefer good public transit to driving, but it's simply not an option in most of the US.

Oh, and another story. In my hometown I absolutely loved the subway as THE way to get around. It was cool in the summer, warm in the winter, and average wait was 2-3 minutes. I visited New York one summer and as per habit I went to take the subway to my destination. It was sweltering hot and I waited 20 minutes for a train. Up to that point I considered NYC to be the closest US city to what I'm used to, but that would have been a deal breaker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

insane that the bus gets its own lane \s

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

True! 10-12 more cars could have fit on that road if it wasn't for that stupid bus.

But the poors have to get to their jobs serving me...

I got it! Let's widen the road! Nobody uses the sidewalk anyway. /S

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

True but people have less of a problem when I masturbate in my car.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly? I judge you every time man, but I can't tear my eyes away

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Majestic, isn’t it? I don’t send dick pics because they just can’t capture its grandeur.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm starting to develop a vigor for public transit to match the one forced on us for car infrastructure in the 60s. Bigger, taller, more, I want 3 bus lanes and a tram line to any town in the country. We can do no wrong taking back all the space we gave to the car, as long as the garbage truck fits on the street, car users can share 1 lane both directions. Take their parking, take their license for rolling stops and using their phone, gift them e-bikes.

Make transit free, let the highways rot, expand the railways. Sorry for that pothole, all the money was used up by rail.

Just anything better than we have now. If we have to act fast and break things, so be it.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

, car users can share 1 lane both directions.

Oh God, I don't trust them with that.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I visited India 30 years ago and (in the southern part of the country at least) the major highways between cities had a single paved lane in the middle and then just dirt and gravel on the steeply-sloped sides. So on bus trips the drivers would stick to the middle until the last possible second and then veer off so that just the right wheels were on the pavement as they passed each other while tipping crazily to each side. I made the huge mistake on my first trip of sitting in the front seat; I later corrected my mistake by always taking the fucking train, which didn't have this problem.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I am sure drivers are furious about that bus lane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mio@feddit.nu 7 points 2 months ago

Require better utilization of the cars or you have to take the bus. Pretty simple.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But how else will the oil companies increase profits for their shareholders?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 2 months ago

by increasing prices while suppressing wages like everyone else?

load more comments
view more: next ›