this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
858 points (92.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26896 readers
2554 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 303 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I've seen predictions of Firefox's downfall for decades. Still waiting for it to happen.

It's really easy to see the headlines saying things like "Firefox is tracking it's users and violating their privacy!!!" And panic. But digging into the latest "scandal" (the PPA), it seems like Firefox is behaving pretty reasonably.

One of the main criticisms is that it's opt-out instead of opt-in. Which... I kind of agree with Mozilla on. 99% of users aren't going to know or care about this, and the 1% that do are the kind of people who probably would have extensions to disable it or just use some obscure ultra-private browser instead.

I don't fault NOYB for bringing it up either. It's good to have organizations like that keeping an eye out for everyone.

But I also get worried that sometimes communies attack their closest allies for being imperfect harder than enemies actively working against their interests.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 86 points 1 month ago (3 children)

For whatever reason Lemmy seems to have an anti-firefox agenda. They make some good points but most of the posts on Lemmy are just pure emotion, speculations, and FUD.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 24 points 1 month ago

It's in the last line of their comment:

But I also get worried that sometimes communies attack their closest allies for being imperfect harder than enemies actively working against their interests.

[–] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

As a former moderator of r/Firefox... We inherited this from reddit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they were violating people's privacy, it would be completely unacceptable to make it opt-out.

But they aren't. They are doing things that some people believe they'll want to violate people's privacy in the future to do in a different way.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn't know what it was, so I looked it up. Their description is here:

https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2024/08/22/ppa-update/

It sounds interesting.. It also sounds like it will fail, because Mozilla seems to think that trackers are primarily interested in collecting ad stats, and that targeted advertising is less critical, but I think in reality it's the other way around, and advertisers won't accept such a limited solution.

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

I see no benefit to this because it will never be used instead of traditional tracking. It will just be a way for advertisers to get data from people who are blocking normal trackers and get even more data from people who aren't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

The sanest take yet. If this were reddit and gold meant anything, you'd deserve it

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was an early adopter of Firefox 20+ years ago. It started going downhill more than 15 years ago and I bailed to Chrome when that launched. It really was better than Firefox at the time. Then Chrome got worse and I wound up back on Firefox, not because Firefox had gotten better in that time but because everything else had gotten worse than Firefox in the intervening time. Also, if going from 48% market share in 2009 to a barely relevant <5% in 2024 doesn’t count as a downfall I’m not sure what does.

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 month ago

Firefox not getting better in the last 15 years is quite disingenuous though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The most fragile thing to me is their funding stream, which may even serve as a source of enshittification demands, implemented as subtly as possible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 184 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This process has been underway since the project switched their focus from the Mozilla Suite to Firefox. Early Firefox was lightweight with limited features and the idea that you would add your own as extensions for the features you wanted. Then it started gaining traction and the Mozilla developers started forcing features in that should’ve been extensions. It’s been downhill ever since!

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Even better, they took actual extensions and made them built-in and impossible to remove. The work was already done to keep a lightweight browser with extra features in option, and they reverted it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Can confirm, this is accurate.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A few months ago people would have still downvoted your comment, but the message has made it to everyone now. Mozilla and with that Firefox is an endangered species that needs to be steered back into safety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's been going for years now. We just don't want to move away because, frankly, there's little viable alternatives.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Some people are working on ladybird atleast. And gnome web preforms decent

[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Some people are working on ladybird atleast.

Another permissively licensed toy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 month ago (5 children)

i think that the first sign of enshitification is its leaders and it seems like it's already here.

i'm wondering what browser to switch to next.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ladybird! Though it's not slated to be fully ready till 2026

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Zen browser has been an interesting experience. Librewolf & Mullvad have been great 🤠

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

librewolf is my most likely bet; i want to stay away from anything chromium based.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

ladybird might become a thing someday. And if all else fails we can still use curl or emacs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like how whoever made this didn't bother to put IE on the first door.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is a 100% handmade meme by me lol

I actually did consider putting IE, but then I realized IE never went through enshittification it was just always shit lmao so it didn't fit

[–] Cagi@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

IE had a near monopoly on browsing for a long time after Netscape Navigator enshittified (the true first door).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Don't Firefox and Chromium already have that?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dr_01000111@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

can't wait for lady bird browser

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ben garrison comic without any reference to cum?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Lynx is still here for you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

zen browser (hardened) or forked librewolf that is designed to be fast is nice (my distro has this browser called cachy browser its based on librewolf with some compiler optimizations and its nice)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Noooooo.

I like my Extensions.

The internet isn't worth having without Ublock, Ghostery, Scriptmonkey, etc.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Hey! Why not add an AI assistant that summarizes each page I visit! It would be awesome 😎. But only if the computation is done off-site. I don't want to bother my computer cpu too much.....this page depicts 7 consenting adults engaging in what would otherwise be described as an Australian cum slut gangbang clusterfuck with a 3 finger twist and large bottle of rum up the asshole....

Joe! Joe! Come here quick! Remember the dude from yesterday? Yeah, cum slut cluster fuck? Exactly! Look he's asking for it again! I think he likes it. Why don't we send his information to the appropriate authorities?

....ring ring! Yes? Is this the guy who really likes Australia cluster fuck videos? Ehhh, why would you ask such a thing?...well I am the authority on this topic! I wrote the book, see?...and another page ..and another page... Yeah, it's mostly photos of me and my 6 male friends. Oh! Ah!... Can I help you? Well I didn't bring my 6 friends with me but do you have sex guy friends? Oh I said sex, didn't I. Yeah I do have sex friends! Wait a minute, did Mozilla Firefox sent you after they shared my most intimate searches thru the NSA AI servers? Gosh darn it! Well it doesn't matter, what's done is done. I guess I'll just take my pants off, go ahead and get more comfortable too. You want anything to eat while we wait here for my six friends? One of them is really fat, is that okay? I mean he's really, like you know, morbidly obese sort of fat. I hope you are okay with his girth.

And Soo the user had a great time thanks to Mozilla Firefox. The end! She was never found until the x-ray, when her body was found biologically fused and bonded to the user's friend's body along with two other doctors from previous visits. It was pretty bad. It was big news in Australia 🦘.

I gotta go sleep 💤😴💤💤.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Firefox users were too cocky and wouldn't shut up about how amazing it is. The universe took them down a peg.

Do you hear that Linux users?

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Do you hear that Linux users?

There's only one Firefox, there's fucktonnes of Linux Distros. I am even willing to move to fucking Arch if push comes to shove.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Librewolf, Mullvad, Tor, Snowwassel... There's more than one Firefox. Surely if some fucked up AI integration was included, one of them would just disable it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

I'm really holding out for Ladybird.

[–] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wuh oh, I'm OOTL here, what's happening to Firefox?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (7 children)

They've been making announcements indicating that they're going to start focusing on chatbot/AI/LLM bullshit instead of what they should be doing, which is maintaining their web browser.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›