++ I get so bummed out that people who are running models are unabashedly stealing from people left and right and then shrugging their shoulders for their unethical practices. Perhaps pay people for their catalogues at an agreed upon rate or be a disgusting pig and buy from their estate after death. But don't just come out here and train your models on everything as if it were a free for all and as if creativity amounted to nothing more than fodder for unabashed capitalism =/!

AI will be only be able to produce art that already exists or realism.

Well, that is not true at all.

Generative AI isn’t just limited to imitating or copying existing art. It’s fully capable of creating original pieces, much like humans do. Sure, AI models learn from large datasets of existing art, but that doesn’t mean they’re limited to mere copying. Instead, they take these inputs, find patterns, blend concepts, and can then generate something entirely new. This isn’t too different from how human artists operate. They too absorb influences from the world and other pieces of art and generate new ones based on that. Nobody is creating art in a vacuum.

The additional benefit AI has is not being tied down by existing concepts. Human creativity often gets shaped by cultural trends or personal experiences, but AI can step outside those constraints, giving us a fresh take on art and creativity in ways that many human artists can't. Not to even mention that you need a human in the loop to write the prompt. AI doesn't create art alone no more than a paint brush does.

Idk bullshit peddler, I can't get with you on this one. Because I think at the end of the day - anything will be seen as "up for grabs" and illustrators will be on the outs like loomers. And while I am somewhat okay with the idea of rug makers (among other loomable items) being antiquated - creativity should not be because it's the pulse of human expression for many and if we lessen it/deny it - I think the whole world will begin to taste like corn-flakes.

I saw this growing up in a way, they took our arts program and nobody really found any way to express themselves and at the end of the day where I grew up very few people ever amounted to much of anything =/! I think expression is needed, and must be safeguarded because you need to feel safe to express and must know that it's a worthwhile venue to venture into. But this is all kinda arm flapping. You can't stop the future and clearly AI is here to stay - so now we've got to work around what we can.

But, by the by - I still love the bs you're putting down =)

It's already impossible to make money as an artist

It's also because generative AI relies on statistics so an approximation of the number of fingers is used. In that sense 4 and 6 are close enough to 5.

A third reason is that not all fingers are always visible in pictures and drawings, depending on the angle and position. If you try right now to make a 'c' with your hand, you could only see three fingers. This is relevant as while artists know that hands have five fingers, generative models do not 'know' what a hand or a finger are.