this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
34 points (75.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29678 readers
1281 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

DNA doesn't tell you who a person is without having a sample from a person to compare it to... We'd be able to tell if they were human or not. That's about it.

Not only that, but afaik there isn't just 1 body interred there. It's a whole mess of unidentified bodies buried together.

[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you had access to a large genetic database, it would theoretically be possible to find living relatives, provided at least one (even quite distant) relative is included in that database. It may be possible to then retrace familial history to determine who specifically it may have been.

That’s more or less how they managed to find the Golden State Killer. Someone noticed that the GSK’s DNA had distantly related DNA listed in GEDmatch’s private database and family trees were constructed to narrow down suspects until only one remained based on timing, location, and other details. The person listed in the database and the GSK were so distantly related that they only shared a great-great-great-great grandfather.

[–] Tekomepossenomo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the gender. And whether they had chromosomal anomalies

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Unless there was a serious mixup, we already know the soldier was one of four randomly selected males.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

That's not the point of the tomb.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

The tomb would exist with or without bodies being identified. Even if we identified all combatants, there are plenty of other casualties that could deserve similar anonymous respect.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

99 Percent Invisible did an interesting episode about exactly this.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Already has happened.