Why did it have to be Chris Pratt, ugh
Games
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
Is Tom Holland now better known for Uncharted rather than Spiderman?
It's a video game publication, so it makes sense that they would refer to his film based on a video game.
We don't want game movies. We would rather have new games based on these titles. Like how hard is Jax & Daxter? Make it move like GTA with some dark/light magic thrown in and a little steampunk and its done.
What if you actually make a new game in the series first? Or even just remaster the old games? Because I don't think there's a lot of people at the moment that remember the games and would want to see a movie of it.
Who thinks that they'll actually make the movie about the game characters, vs just using the same names and not caring beyond that?
Ehn. Gonna be an easy pass for me.
Honestly couldn’t care less. But if that means more Jak & Daxter games then go ahead.
I'm ok with this. Not excited to have Chris Pratt voice a Jak and Daxter character but it'll bring attention to the IP which might give us a new game.
I hope the rumors are false. Hasn't hollywood ruined enough franchises by now? At the very least give us a remaster of the original trilogy, they're timeless masterpieces.