this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
698 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59572 readers
3414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Server side ads sound more expensive for Google to me. I'll just use some future plugin that blacks out the screen or whatever if it comes to that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This is where AI would come in handy. Start scrubbing the buffer as it’s coming in to identify the difference and jump past it.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Aren't they legally required to indicate that an ad is playing? Should be almost trivial to detect and I don't know how they'd get around that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago

Does the ad restrict play back controls (such as disabling fast forward)? Trivial for an add-on to detect and if nothing else black out the video and mute the audio until playback controls are restored.

If it doesn't restrict fast forward then everyone can skip the ad without an ad-blocker.

Also, now that ads are server side YouTube is more responsible for the content of them as they are hosting them.

I have no problems with this.

[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (18 children)

Ad blockers are useful for more than just YouTube. So they are not going anywhere. However it will be a bummer if we can no longer block YouTube ads.

On android I have to endure the ads but on desktop I never see them.

[–] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I use revanced:

Revanced manager: https://revanced.app/download

MicroG: https://github.com/revanced/gmscore/releases/tag/v0.3.1.3.240913

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The moment they fix the search, fix their recommendations, stop wasting money on junk projects like games and allow me to completely disable Shorts, I will resubscribe to YT Premium.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Google is getting desprite

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Maybe if they cleared out the scams and served more than 3 ads on repete, I wouldn't feel the need to block them. Yes, no one likes ads, but I get its to pay for the content I'm watching for free.

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

fucking YouTube, am i right?

no seriously, havent used it in months, and weirdly dont Miss it. i used to watch YouTube the whole day.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

May I ask what do you use for content instead of YouTube? A lot of certain people I follow are on YouTube and music that I listen to are often only on YouTube these days. Not even Spotify has the niche songs (mainly Arabic and Japanese songs).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Next article...UBlock has designed AI to detect ads and blackout/mute video until it is done. Even better, it can buffer queued videos ahead of time and just remove ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sazey@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Commercial detection systems exist already although I couldn't vouch for their efficacy. How they will integrate with streaming however is another question.

I for one am excited for this phase of the cat & mouse game, as solving this challenge means keeping the monkey off our backs for good while longer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I'm so fucking sick of their greedy bullshit

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (15 children)

And that’s when I moved to Invidious and haven’t looked back

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Aha! So this is how one snuck into a video I downloaded last night. Fuckers. At least with a locally downloaded file I can quickly skip ahead.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (18 children)

I'm sure I'll be downvoted to hell, but I just pay for Premium because I use YouTube all the time, don't want to see ads, and acknowledge that YouTube is an incredible service/product.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›