this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Games

16841 readers
1310 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This game looks interesting, but its audience is a bit of a niche in a niche. It may not sell well enough despite being eye-catching.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It still has all the hallmarks, different setting, tactical defence mini game instead of the trial. I think the trip up might be change in genre conflicting with the "one person dies per mini game" but maybe they can weave a strong story or make that compelling in itself.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Well, Danganronpa was already in a bit of a niche, and now mix that with the niche Fire Emblem fandom, either this game was only made for the Japanese market, or the developers must have some ace up their sleeve marketing.

Most people who liked Danganronpa probably will not like the tactical strategy mix up, and the people that like Fire Emblem probably won't like permanently losing characters for story reasons so quickly. And FE had ways to revive dead characters, which is not something Danganronpa had because what impact is there when a character that dies can just be brought back to life?

Its like taking an already sort of small audience and then cutting out a smaller slice.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FE had permanent character loss as a main feature until recently and even then it's a difficulty option and there's no way to get them back.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FE has had ways of bringing back dead characters for a while. Aum staff, lion statues, etc.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Don't know how I've never encountered those before XD

[–] pujamas@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not a big fan of this headline. It makes things sound really dismal, but the paragraph it's quoting starts with:

Through laugher, Kodaka notes that Too Kyoo Games is still in debt

I'm sure things are tight, but it sounds like they're in pretty good spirits, and have found a publisher that will work with them despite their being in debt.