this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
112 points (94.4% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2624 readers
18 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kriz@slrpnk.net 58 points 7 months ago (3 children)

sigh. I am not ready for 5 to 10 years of dumbshit conspiracy theories about a bridge.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I follow loads of conspiracies, knowledge fight is my favorite podcast, but I never thought for a second they'd make conspiracies out of this.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you kidding me? They'll make conspiracies about absolutely anything, and nothing at all.

I use to browse r/Conspiracytheories once in a while to see what the echo chamber was up to, and it was always a bunch of idiots throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I'm not even gonna keep my eye on this conspiracy theory. It's boring af

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Well I mean jar jar has a Caribbean black accent... so you just gotta go with this obviously.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Hang onto your butts

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's just too many conspiracy theories to keep track of these days. Like, is it really hard to believe that a ship could accidentally lose power and drift into a support pillar? You really need a conspiracy theory for that?

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No boat has ever crashed before OBUMMER got into office!!1!

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

-Titanic deniers

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

Thanks, Obama.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A) Thinking the Daily Mail is a reliable source of information proves how brain-addled this person is.

B) Ah, specially trained to avoid obstacles, unlike all those other ships that are constantly running into things ...

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's also SOP for a ship to be piloted by a specialist from that waterway rather than a member of the crew (as happened here). My terminology is all wrong, but you get the picture.

[–] Lupus108@feddit.de 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah, like you said it's SOP. In Hamburg, Germany any ship above 90 meters gets a specialized pilot to navigate the port, there is a logistical network in place to shuttle those pilots to and from the ships they are needed on. You are not allowed to navigate your ship in the port without one.

It's a highly specialized job and it's the dream of most seafaring folk around here - study nautics, become first officer for a couple of years, become captain and travel the world, after TEN years you qualify for the special pilot training and then you get the dream job of being paid like a captain but sleep at home every night.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

To be fair to the Daily Mail (!!!!) I think that’s some straight reporting that there was a pilot on board. Not sure what difference that makes when the power goes out and you lose steering.

[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

These people can vote😭

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 7 months ago

It's truly astonishing to see how one event can be traced back to its roots, with each subsequent cause revealing itself as more ridiculous than the last. And so we come to unravel the mystery behind the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore. Instead of placing the blame at the feet of our former president, Barack Obama, we must venture further back in history and discover that this catastrophe can ultimately be attributed to none other than Martin Van Buren.

At first glance, this may seem preposterous, but bear with us. Martin Van Buren was the eighth President of the United States, serving from 1837 to 1841. During his time in office, he faced an economic crisis known as the Panic of 1837. This financial downturn led to widespread unemployment, businesses failing, and people losing their homes. As a result, many Americans flocked to cities like Baltimore for work and shelter.

The influx of people brought about an increase in demand for transportation infrastructure. However, due to Van Buren's failed policies during the Panic of 1837, adequate funding wasn't allocated toward building bridges. The construction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge was delayed, causing chronic traffic congestion around the harbor. It all came to a head when the container ship, frustrated by the endless lines of cars, decided to take matters into its own hands, crashing into the bridge as if demanding a solution to the traffic problem.

But even before that, Van Buren's policies had another indirect effect on the bridge's collapse. His administration witnessed the rise of the Whig Party as a major political force in opposition to the Democratic Party. In response to this challenge, Van Buren alienated key political allies within his own party. One such person was Francis Scott Key, who wrote the national anthem, "The Star-Spangled Banner."

Key's disillusionment with Van Buren ultimately resulted in him withdrawing from politics. Had he remained in power, perhaps he would have dedicated more resources towards constructing a sturdier bridge. Instead, the subpar construction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge proved to be its undoing.

[–] Volkditty@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

If Obama did it, he probably had a good reason.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That didn't happen. And if it did it wasn't that bad. And if it was it wasn't a big deal. And if it was then it wasn't his direct decision. And if it was he didn't mean it. And if he did it wasn't illegal. And if it was he has immunity as an ex-president. Joe Biden's Murder Team 6 is now en route, please do not leave the premises.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 8 points 7 months ago

Bro. It's a cyberattack, bro. There's literally no other explanation, bro. It explains everything

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Leave the World Behind is the adaptation of a book by Rumam Alaam. So if anybody is the evil mastermind, it's him. Apparently, besides writing thrillers, he hosts two podcasts for Slate. Yep, sounds like a Bond villian to me!

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But…like…what is all this shit about Obama being connected to that movie? I kept seeing it, but just basically assumed maybe he had some money invested in it, but I can’t find a connection to him anywhere in any information. Is this just a complete fabrication? Or is it more of an over assumption of a small connection?

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

One of the production companies connected to the film, Higher Ground Productions, was founded by the Obamas. They are credited as executive producers. Apparently Barack is a fan of the book.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Which is a far cry from co-writing the movie of course. Also, without having the read the book, it felt very much in line with the sensibilities of Sam Esmail, who did write (and direct) the movie and who also did "Mr. Robot".

[–] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Oh, c'mon, give a little credit.

Mikhail, or Ivan, or whoever put a little effort into that one!

[–] Steve@startrek.website 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Right? I mean this is solid irrefutable evidence.

[–] kralk@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I thought the lesson was like, "that film was pretty prescient". I was convinced until the Bible quote!