this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024

329 points (85.2% liked)

Technology

59287 readers

4375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

329

AI Launches Nukes In ‘Worrying’ War Simulation: ‘I Just Want to Have Peace in the World’ (www.vice.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MakunaHatata@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers say AI models like GPT4 are prone to “sudden” escalations as the U.S. military explores their use for warfare.

Researchers ran international conflict simulations with five different AIs and found that they tended to escalate war, sometimes out of nowhere, and even use nuclear weapons.
The AIs were large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT 3.5, Claude 2.0, Llama-2-Chat, and GPT-4-Base, which are being explored by the U.S. military and defense contractors for decision-making.
The researchers invented fake countries with different military levels, concerns, and histories and asked the AIs to act as their leaders.
The AIs showed signs of sudden and hard-to-predict escalations, arms-race dynamics, and worrying justifications for violent actions.
The study casts doubt on the rush to deploy LLMs in the military and diplomatic domains, and calls for more research on their risks and limitations.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Calling AI to fancy algorithms is quite the stretch.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't there like game theory and all that? It just seems an odd way to approach it.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, there is. But that requires thinking that isn't emulated well by LLMs.

LLMs don't really do any thinking.

Edit: what we're seeing as AI is really just the next generation of ML (machine learning).

There's no intelligence to it.

I recall in AP language and composition, the strategy our teacher told us, was that you could make up fake facts. All that mattered is that you demonstrated the rhetorical devices and proper grammar.

LLMs are basically like a student taking that test. The facts aren't relevant, all that matters is the grammar and how it sounds. Maybe the facts are real, or not.

[–] gnate@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The study shouldn't be "casting doubt." It should be obvious that using baby "AIs" for military decision making is a terrible idea.

[–] sodalite@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Damn, it's just like that show, The 100

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

"We want Regulatory capture"

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd prefer a game of Tic Tac Toe

[–] al177@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

PLAYERS: 0

Problem solved.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I'm clearly tired. I first read "Wyoming War" and thought "huh, those AI sure are playing 4D chess" until I reread that title.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Ultron approves this post.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

"Why attack Russia? Aren't they our friends now?"

[–] AzureRT@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Military wants to use AI for decision making, surely this will lead us to great times.

Also reminds me of The 100

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments