this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
779 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37738 readers
361 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of "planned obsolescence".

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Planned Obsolesce should be a crime

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I would have agreed with that statement until I saw the most recent Technology Connections video about why the incandescent light bulb has planned obsolescence built in. Sometimes it's not malicious but to actually provide a compromise leading to an overall better product.

I don't think software death dates count, tho.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JEB5w9@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

The service life of the devices was known up-front. You can check for yourself the service life dates of every Chrome OS machine here:

https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/6220366?hl=en

The correct deployment strategy would be to make a big purchase at the front end of a device's lifecycle and then only replacements from then on out so that you get the most out of every machine. Future capital purchases would be with a new device and termination date.

[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

These things are such junk - even when new they were so slow and bloated that they couldn't load my kid's schoolwork half the time. I had to make sure he had an alternate laptop for use so he wouldn't fall behind. I felt really bad for the school district, it was clear they were being ripped off, and that most of the machines were going to be in a landfill within 3 years time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, maybe that will get them to stop using Chrome OS in schools, it has been a disaster for computer literacy in general.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

I have preordered a framework laptop which will run Linux until it fucking blows up or falls apart.

Enough with being screwed over by well known brands whose interest is just selling you more and more stuff.

[–] NeccoNeko@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anyone got a non-paywalled version of the article?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xyguy@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

When I was in 9th grade it was netbooks with Windows 7 and they were also terrible and fated for the recycling bin before I was a junior.

In most enterprise IT your lifespan for hardware is between 5 and 7 years maybe 10 for printers and network switches.

I'm sure most schools try to stretch hardware as far as it will go but IT would have known when they bought the Chromebooks that they'd not be long for this world as cheap as they were and that's the price they would pay for paying such a low price.

I think what is sticking up the works is on an administrative level, higher ups are expecting IT departments to stretch EOL dates like they used to do with Windows machines but now they absolutely can't and Admin didn't plan to have to buy all new whether or not IT did

[–] fogetaboutit@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ok I'll bite, can't they reinstall the chromebooks with linux instead?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sure, but then they have to pay the salaries of an IT department to not only do the OS install on thousands of devices, but also provide support when things go wonky from kids doing dumb shit (it's Linux; there will be that one kid who figures out how to gain su privileges and convinces a couple others to rm -f / their shit). The same thought crossed my mind, but these are low spec $200 laptops that I really don't think it would be financially viable to do so.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

great scenario for an immutable distro

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My 15 years old Linux laptop can still do everything (except gaming new titles)

load more comments (1 replies)

Hey Mike Judge should make a movie about this

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›