this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
682 points (78.0% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2258 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not the eating it really. It's the farming and processing. I think it's important to be clear so consumers aren't stuck with all the blame.we buy what's cheap and available and their pursuit of that has lead us here.

[–] Marshyq@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course it's the eating, why would they be farming so many animals so intensively if it wasn't for demand? It's a complete abdication of personal responsibility to say that eating meat is ok but farming it isn't. Maybe you can argue that hunting meat is negligible in terms of impact but there's a reason we don't all hunt, there's not enough of a sustainable population of any game animal that would keep the number of meat eaters we have today fed. Factory farming is a requirement for our current level of consumption.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's a silly statement. Then let's say driving our cars doesn't either. It's the combustion engine processing the gasoline, but turning the wheel and pressing the pedal does nothing

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A plant based diet is cheaper, maybe not as available if you eat out or fast food a lot but that comes down to demand.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-11-11-sustainable-eating-cheaper-and-healthier-oxford-study

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] float@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

It's not just the CO2. It's also the water consumption. Wait another 10 years and the water might be the bigger problem.

[–] stackcheese@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Nah Corporations and industries creates 1000x more greenhouse gases than meat and agriculture.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only four? I thought it'd be much higher

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›