this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
250 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
187 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently, stealing other people's work to create product for money is now "fair use" as according to OpenAI because they are "innovating" (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

"Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials," wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit "misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence."

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teri@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] sculd@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Yup, I saw that too. There is also another thread on this board that is discussing this issue.

One interesting thing I noticed is how the AI apologists in this thread seems to be quiet on the other.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

“Oh you know it’s like in Fight Club”

“Sorry I have been trained in a legal matter and therefore know no cultural references from the last 30 years”

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›