this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
259 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have installed both uBlock Origin and NoScript in Firefox. Does it make sense to use both at the same time? I was wondering whether or not uBlock Origin is able to do everything that NoScript does. If not, what does NoScript have that uBlock Origin does not?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

uBlock has specific things that it blocks and configurable rules. NoScript just blocks all JS regardless of its purpose.

[–] random4333@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My understanding is yes it can. You need to adjust the blocking mode.

[–] zaplachi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there a simple way to block individual scripts with uBlock? I’ve only found a simple way to block 3rd or 1st party scripts and frames altogether.

[–] random4333@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can use the element zapper or picker to remove individual elements on a page.

[–] carloshr 5 points 1 year ago

You can also use the logger to identify specific elements and then create a rule to block them.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I recommend uMatrix for targeted blocking.

[–] carloshr 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far I understand it's no necessary to use both. You can do everything that Noscript does with uBO.

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Right. Second sentence on this site says this:

But it can also be used in a manner similar to NoScript (to block scripts) and/or RequestPolicy (to block all 3rd-party servers by default), using a point-and-click user interface.

[–] PickTheStick@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I use both as well. Ublock would let a lot of things through that NoScript does not. Ublock also gets stuff that NoScript does not. Facebook and google stuff? Zapped by noscript. Youtube ads? NoScript lets them through because you have to okay the youtube player, while Ublock blocks them.

Only complaint I have with NoScript is that it doesn't seem like I can allow scripts without it automatically reloading the page anymore. It was nice to be able to click the 'expand image' here, see that NS blocked the script, allow the script, and just click the 'expand image' twice more to close/open it. Now I have to click 'expand image,' unblock the script, the page reloads, I have to go find the post again, and then see it. If you figure that out, let me know.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NoScript to block specific JS elements on a page. If you have visited any Chinese online shop like Aliexpress or Linsoul I'm sure you'll appreciate NoScript to be able to only unblock the essential JS to be able to interact with the site and block every other tracker

[–] carloshr 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

uBO can also do exactly the same. And more ☝🏻

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am only able to block either every JS script or none. How do I select which scripts to block? This was the reason I installed NoScript

[–] carloshr 2 points 1 year ago

You can identify specific scripts with the logger and from the same window you create a dynamic rule

[–] grehund@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I found I was spending too much time managing NoScript that I dropped it and now rely mostly on uBO.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you want something like NoScript, the creator of uBlock as another most excellent extension called uMatrix, which offers a dizzying level of granularity!

[–] Matth78@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may be available but there is no more development and GitHub repo has been archived in 2021. I believe it was because you could do what uMatrix does with ublock but I can't find Gorhill statement from back then.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't know, unfortunate!

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to use uMatrix, but stopped using it because it was discontinued. It might still work, but it stopped getting updated because the dev wanted to focus on uBlock.

[–] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Damn I never noticed, as it's been working just fine.. Gotta switch fully to uBlock then

[–] understandable@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

No. NoScript has more granular control over the different kinds of things that you can block per domain and is more similar to the now discontinued uMatrix in that regard.

[–] Cabowski@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

I would also like to know

load more comments
view more: next ›