this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
155 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39127 readers
2949 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 77 points 11 months ago (5 children)

why would he say the quiet part out loud? how would this not make him seem like a piece of shit?

i tried to read in the article where he might say something about why but it really is just 'profits at all costs'.. wants to avoid the use of words like 'ethical'.. gotcha. i understand what kind of person you are now.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I think this is misrepresenting what he said. His stance is basically that he felt like they were punishing honest workers and business partners, people who never lied or cheated or hurt anyone, for something that they had no part in due to public pressure. He’s not wrong either unless people have some kind of explanation for how a cosmetics manufacturer is supposed to stop Putin from murdering innocent Ukrainians fighting against his pointless war and innocent Russians who don’t want to fight for him.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Because it might apply pressure to those rich enough to influence Putin. Because it slows their economy. Because it sends a message.

It's one raindrop in the flood. But without raindrops, there is no flood.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Yeah but that's what sanctions are. It's not really possible to have convenient sanctions. How would that work.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Sanctions are typically the acts of a government state not the actions of a business. Businesses have to comply with them but only if they’re bound by them. That wasn’t the case here. Lush did this based on public outcry, not sanctions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 13 points 11 months ago (10 children)

A cosmetics manufacturer alone? No.

All western companies leaving however can make an economic hit that will benefit Ukraine.

As for the Russians? They can revolt or do something, otherwise they suffer. Who cares about them.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They suffer if they revolt too.

Judging by your name, you're an Aussie and I've got to say, disappointed in your complete writing off of the entire Russian population. How the fuck is some young girl working at Lush supporting Putin or deserving of suffering if they don't revolt?

[–] hitmyspot@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Her taxes directly support the war. It's not as easy as people are good and bad. Good people can be in bad situations. Sanctions are supposed to hurt all people. That's how they work. It's seen as a lesser evil, rather than a good. They are damaging for both sides.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 11 months ago

good points, thank you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think the article paints a pretty good portrait of a complicated but socially responsible business owner, even though I do think pulling out of Russia was the right thing to do even if it wasn't what he would've chosen.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I'll take an honest cunt over a deceitful cunt any day of the week.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

That's the name of the game with carotidien. Profits at all costs.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

And some people still say that the customers are helpless and calling for boycott doesn't work...

If people would demand other industries to be more in line with their moral values (like about climate change) that could also change a lot

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's good to know. Since Lush doesn't seem to sell their stuff in other retail locations, it will be much easier to never buy Lush products again.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Atleast he isn't lying. Every other company is waiting for the right time to go back why shouldn't he? I am under no illusion that all businesses that left Russia did it because of the goodness of their hearts.

Are you going to boycott all the other business that left too?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That picture looks like a cross between Leo Laporte and Robert DeNiro

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

"Hey, Call for Help is on!"

[–] intelshill@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dude's a greedy pig, what do you expect?

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If you actually read the article it doesn't seem to be about the money:

Mr Constantine said: “It was horrible. I hated it because we have a very diverse workforce and lots of people who probably wouldn’t be welcome in Russia.

“We had a partner of 20 years in Russia who never cheated, never lied, and we had to tell him we weren’t going to supply him anymore.

(The Telegraph doesn't close some of their “quotes” for some reason)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As far as I remember, that's the correct use of continued quotation in English

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

huh, i didn't know that was a thing

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Indeed. I'm reading the OG Frankenstein book and found this out when quotes were only at the start of a paragraph and never closed, for pages at a time.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lmao for a minute i thought the public was deeply invested in the remote control vibrator Lush by Lovense

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

We are! This isn't it though. Don't put this up there. It'll ruin the pH.

load more comments
view more: next ›