this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
18 points (72.5% liked)

Skeptic

1349 readers
30 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Genetic engineering has sky-high potential for our agricultural needs, but we've pissed that away with things like mass-patenting genomes and engineering for things like pesticide immunity over traits that are valuable to the environment or consumer.

There's no money in using it ethically, so I wouldn't place any bets on us changing course any time soon.

[–] potatar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It isn't THE solution, it is A solution. The title is wrong.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The entire article is anti-gmo bs.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if it's about "solving" climate change so much as it's about mitigating the effects of climate change on global food production.

[–] LeadEyes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I haven't heard anyone try to argue that they would reduce atmospheric levels of green house gases but they sure can allow you to grow crops that are more resistant to drought, require less pesticides and even reduce the need for fertilizer. Potentially reducing the amount of energy intensive inputs for agriculture would have an impact on the environment to some degree.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This article is simply fear mongering.

They can also trigger substantial unintended changes in the genetic material of plants.

So can normal breeding. In fact that's all you get with normal breeding - random changes. You hope the things you want happen. Witness killer bees for example.

Just because it's "big scary pharma" doesn't mean everything is evil.

These crops aren't the solution but they can be part of a solution.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The capitalists will be conning us into selling us "solutions" to what they have wrought long after they've retreated to and are barking orders remotely from their luxury bunker compounds protecting them from a scorched hellscape where it hurts to breathe.

And sadly, there'll still be laborers and managers and security forces singing their praises into their own oblivion. "Phone man issues us ration cards! cough Show some respect and work harder on their shipment of cough carbon filters!"

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You mean to tell me that doubling down on playing god isn't the solution to problems caused by hubris?