this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
162 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3726 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

WhatsApp: "you can now use email to access your account if you can't use your phone for some reason"

This community: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People acting like a phone number isn't 100x more personally identifiable than email are delusional. I have like 700 unique emails atm, and can create a new one within seconds. I only have a few numbers.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my country we're required to have our own identification tied to the number and we can only legally have a handful of number under a person name. Email is nothing lol.

[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I lived in a country doing that, and couldn't understand the people making social media profiles with their (actually traceable to a real life identity) phone numbers public. Don't you love receiving spam calls?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 1 year ago

Funny thing is, there's a time where the hot topic is basically facebook eavesdropping conversation then put on ads with item relevant to the conversation. Everyone talk about it being creepy, but everyone keep using it without any change. I think they just don't care ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I have a catch-all address with a personal domain. Infinite aliases for free.

[–] b000urns@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hmm🤔 I use Migadu and could probably set this up -- is this actually a good idea?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A catch-all is not a good idea. But Migadu lets you do something called pattern rewrites which are aliases that can contain wildcards. So you can set up a pattern like shop-*@yourdomain.tld and use addresses like shop-amazon@, shop-etsy@ etc.

It doesn't have to be "shop" you can use anything you want and make up the pattern in any way you want ("ama.shop.zon@" or whatever you can think of).

It's better than plus addresses ("realaddress+amazon@") because it doesn't have to include your real address, and you can make a pattern that nobody can guess, but still retain the ability to use one address per site so you know who's spamming you, and you can make them up on the fly.

In fact I no longer use my "real" address for anything except logging into IMAP and SMTP, I use aliases or patterns for everything else.

Edit: If you want to also be able to send email from these addresses make sure to enable "wildcard sender" for the associated mailbox.

These addresses do have one downside similar to catch-all: if one of them starts getting spam you have to make an explicit deny rule for it. Some people contend that this is a messy approach and they'd rather make regular (non-wildcard) aliases and deny everything else. The downside with that however is that you can no longer make up addresses on the fly, you have to go to the Migadu admin to create the alias every time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't you also get infinite spam?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Index_Case@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I use Proton Mail, which lets you make 'aliases', which you can use for different sites. The alias forward staright to your main (or a nominated) email.

You can use https://simplelogin.io/ to do the same, and I'm sure there are similar services around.

E.g. I can't have feckwhatsapp@feckfacebook.com as my WhatsApp email, and it would forward to whatever account I normally use.

I do this for pretty much everything on line, so they all have their own bespoke email for me.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that they're reaching for emails in addition to phone numbers. Don't think for a second they're going to let you login with just email. They want email just to have yet another data metric to profile you with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My reeeing depends on if they are going to make it mandatory. And I have a feeling they are coming full force on the enshittification bandwagon.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

You mean instead of tying into a phone, right ?

The only point in time my lack of a phone number becomes an issue is for archaic stuff like this.

[–] Orbit79@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe they need it to link WA accounts to FB accounts.

Signal FTW.

[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I know Signal is technically better but Telegram provides a much better user experience than Signal or WhatsApp and is also less problematic than WhatsApp.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 1 year ago

The problem with telegram is that it's not even e2e encrypted by default.

But the ui is really nice. I wonder why no other project simply forked telegram's client and focused on the encryption and server side code

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering Telegram has partnered with Tencent, I wouldn't say it's less problematic.

[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

My understanding is that Telegram is partnered with a non profit crypto group, and that group is partnered with like 20 different companies that validate transactions, one of which is Tencent.

Granted I only read a couple articles on it in the last five minutes cause this was the first I heard of it, there could be more to the story I missed.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yep.

Telegram is a decent middle ground. UI/UX matters, I'm not sure how the folks at Signal are completely missing that point.

The Signal UI is OK, as a competitor to SMS. But it's terrible compared to Telegram. This matters to non-technical people, it's how you get them to use it. Plus the seamless connection between devices - that's crucial. I can chat using whatever device is in front of me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You need to explicate the hell out of this cuz I vehemently disagree and point out, in terms of user experience its dogshit for me (but also implicitly that Telegram is conveniently insecure by default and even if you "encrypt", ifs a non-documented public slop version of messaging encryption [novel + security by obscurity]

Consequently, I would never be comfortable trusting it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Signal

Which wants a phone #.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Teritz@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am waiting for Cross Messenger Law of Europe it means that Signal and Whatsapp User can talk to each other.

If Whatsapp really wants to scare away there Users many are gonna switch because of the Email old persons have EMails but no clue how to use it.

Its easier to install another Messenger than EMail Verifikation.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I think Signal is against that because it compromises their security model. Also I think they aren't required by law to implement it but I'm not sure.

[–] randombullet@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

DDG proxy here I come

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

watsapp, fellow kidz?!

load more comments
view more: next ›