this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
432 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59695 readers
2468 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: 'It's a national security threat'::WPDE covers news, sports, weather, and local events in and around the Grand Strand, Pee Dee, and the Border Belt.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 187 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But she's fine with continuing the anonymous donations to all the PACs that fund her.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's different you see. Because money is speech and therefore needs to be protected, including by allowing total anonymity of donors. Whereas we're talking about online accounts, where people of course never engage in speech or express ideas. Hey, wait a second that can't be right. Hmmm, okay maybe it's because she's saying it's a security risk, because you don't know if they're a foreign national spreading propaganda online. This is totally different from political donations, which of course have never been bribes from foreign powers masked by anonymity... Hey wait! She got us again. Almost like she's some kind of shill who wipes her butt with the constitution while trying to create a crony supported facist state. No that can't be.

But yeah, according to Republicans, money is speech, but speech is not speech. I'm expecting their next campaign platform to be 2+2=5.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah yes, one step closer to a totalitarian state. Let’s go.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Republicans really hate privacy don't they. In 20 years theyre gonna ban bathroom doors so they can make sure the "right" people are in the "right" bathrooms.

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Such a move would lead to an increase in “civility,” Haley believes. “When they know their pastor, their family members can see it, it's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country," she said.

That's what everyone said about posting next to your real name on Facebook. How did that turn out?

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Pretty good, actually. It was nice of the traitors to upload pictures of themselves in the act on Jan 6.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mlong99@lemm.ee 75 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree with Nimarata Hailey, everyone should use their real names in social media and everywhere

[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I looked it up, and it's actually spelled Nimrata. Which is funny, because it sounds like it would be a romantic language's feminine form of nimrod.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Always has been. I remember when the people losing their damn mind about drag were horrified at North Korea’s approved haircut list.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

lol I’d love to see how the US Government would be able to enforce such a thing.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 30 points 1 year ago

Narrator: "They couldn't"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, more of that American freedom I hear so much about as an American.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Oh fuck off, would ya?

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How will she round up all the minorities if they're anonymous online?

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

This is some 00s level politicians not understanding how the Internet works.

[–] kite@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why even bother? It's not like anything is ever done about the non-anonymous threats we currently see. Ffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Terrible idea. Look, the nerds set up the internet and from the beginning never used their real names. There's a reason for that.

So if these genius' knew better, Hayley should learn from that.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I'm an internet Originalist. What did the founding nerds think? That's all that matters."

I enjoy this take quite a lot and will be using it myself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The dumb part is this vow doesn't even make sense on the face of it to protect national security.

[–] MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

National security is now anyone's feelings about mean things.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Republican feelings. About anything really.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 30 points 1 year ago

Someone doesn't understand the internet...

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The gop is a national security threat

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

So she wants reddit and youtube like platforms to be named individuals. Is she going to then go after all the forums that still exist? If so, I guess I'll see you guys next in a Dialup BBS.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago

First they came for our shit post accounts, and I said nothing....

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't anybody tell her that the Fediverse exists. It might break her brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

So, she really wants to just tank her own campaign, huh?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Every political donation should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat," she said. "When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (10 children)

So how is she going to make them non-anonymous in a way that businesses can properly verify identity? Does every single social media site need to have its own ID analysis system for every state-ID? I mean that seems like it would be ridiculously hard.

For that to be practical, they'd need something nation-wide, and probably digital.

So, does she want to suggest to her fanbase a national digital ID? How would htat go?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

This will help me afford a home! This will help me afford kids! This will make me feel safe at traffic stops! This will help my union at work! This will help our extreme temperature swings!

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Agree with her views on algorithm transparency, however abolishing anonymous accounts won't improve the situation around misinformation.

Facebook has required your real name for a long time, and it still resorted into people dissecting into echo chambers supporting their views points.

Yes, anonymous accounts allow people to hide behind a mask, but a lot of people spreading misinformation aren't afraid of being humiliated or ridiculed. It even helps spread it faster (celebrities, influencers, etc) in a lot of situations.

[–] InstallGentoo@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are people who will defend this

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I think she just wants to abolish social media. The memes get to her.

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 year ago

It was not the land of the free?

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Terrorism enabler, Nikki Haley

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Show us your Pornhub account, Nikki

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

How are you going to disable anonymous accounts? You can always be anonymous if you want, meaning that this ends, AGAIN, with normies not having anonymous access and nerds and criminals still having anonymous access

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm game for this...Republicans would disappear from the net overnight if they had to use their real names.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›