this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
562 points (95.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
411 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CodeBlooded@programming.dev 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Real talk- I agree with this meme as truth.

The more and more I use CICD tools, the more I see value in scripting out my deployment with shell scripts and Dockerfiles that can be run anywhere, to include within a CICD tool.

This way, the CICD tool is merely a launch point for the aforementioned deployment scripts, and its only other responsibility is injecting deployment tokens and credentials into the scripts as necessary.

Anyone else in the same boat as me?

I’d be curious to hear about projects where my approach would not work, if anyone is willing to share!

Edit: In no way does my approach to deployment reduce my appreciation for the efforts required to make a CICD pipeline happen. I’m just saying that in my experience, I don’t find most CICD platforms’ features to be necessary.

[–] wso277@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is pretty much what we do as well

All the build logic is coded in python scripts, the jenkins file only defines the stage (with branch restrictions) and calls the respective script function.

This means it works on all machines and if we need to move away from jenkins integration with a new ci platform would require minimal effort.

load more comments (11 replies)