3
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpunkyBarnes@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago

Don’t tell me. The full bibliography of Ayn Rand adorns your bookcase?

[-] Bloonface@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You really couldn't be more wrong.

You don't have to be a Randroid or a libertarian, or even right wing, to understand that a discourse predicated on everyone getting everything for free with no real trade-off doesn't really make sense in the real world.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

You're entirely ignoring network effects. No one is saying Amazon should have made a loss indefinitely, or at all. They're saying that they deliberately made a loss to lock customers and businesses into their platform.

Network effects matter a great deal and I gave up half way through this article because I couldn't find any sign at all that you recognised this. It's liberal garbage: "Hey kids, here's how the world works if you entirely ignore power".

Hopeless. Sorry.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

3 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 1 year ago