120
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
120 points (96.2% liked)
World News
32076 readers
1888 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I tried to read this, but without proper context and what seems like bad writing (to me), I gave up a few paragraphs in. Can someone summarize what this means?
What I think happened was the government submitted sealed documents (i. E. not for public disclosure) for consideration in the case and she made public reference/comments on the aforementioned documents, potentially exposing another ongoing investigation.
Anyone more lawyerly feel free to correct.
She also has gone outside her jurisdiction, again, by questioning the Washington DC grand jury.