this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
152 points (98.7% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14289 readers
1 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why is the recent news around the LK-99 room-temperature superconductor such a big deal? What material impact would those findings have on electronics and modern technology?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sem@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For example, you can resolve a lot of blockers of scaling quantum computers based on superconductive qubits.

[–] Standingcat@feddit.fun 13 points 1 year ago

My 5 year old appreciates this very clear answer.

[–] AMull@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Well obviously

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quantum computing needs to be cold to avoid thermal noise from destroying coherence. A room temperature superconductor probably doesn't enable room temperature quantum computing.

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that if you can scale your physical qubits easily you will be able to use all the power of error correction codes. Even a thousand of physical qubits per one logical qubit should be feasible if you do not need to support superconductivity by helium coolers.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Error correction relies on the majority of values to remain unchanged. I don't think that assumption holds for qubits at room temperature. I'll admit that I'm not well read enough to be certain.

Room temperature superconductors would be great for a lot of applications, but I don't think they do that much to enable quantum computing.

Afaik superconducting quantum computers are operated well below the critical temperature for copper. They wouldn't go through that extra effort if it wasn't necessary.

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it might help in general right? Less resistance means less thermal noise?

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

At the temps needed, regular copper is superconducting.

It could be helpful in some of the intermediary stages to reduce heat production, but it's not going to be a major linchpin for quantum computing. They'll still need cryostats and liquid helium cooling.