this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
1871 points (97.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
337 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean I use Deluge anyway, but Qbittorrent is also libre and actually has a more permissive license (so more freedom)

Edit: apparently I looked at the wrong qbittorrent in github. The real one is GPL too so no more free than Deluge.

[–] cyyypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

qBit and Deluge are both under copyleft GPL, what do you mean with "more permissive"?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As said in my other comment down the chain, I was looking at another repo named Qbittorrent by accident. That one was MIT.

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Deluge is GPLv3 only. Qbittorrent is a mix of GPLv2 and GPLv3. Personally I'll stick to v3 since it includes specific terms that protect against modern DRM and ways to circumvent GPLv2.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, right, I googled qbittorrent license earlier and accidentally instead read another similarly named project's license, which was MIT. You're right, Qbittorrent isn't really any more free than Deluge.