World News

43275 readers

3632 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

For many of us, it doesn’t cost much to improve someone’s life, and we can do much more of it: Most countries spend less than 1% of their national income on foreign aid. (ourworldindata.org)

submitted 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Mee@reddthat.com to c/world@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I said earlier, pressuring governments in rich countries to increase foreign aid — or voting for political parties that would — is just one way that I can help move money from the top to the bottom of the global income distribution.

I also donate some of my money directly to the most effective causes. Several years ago, I took the Giving What We Can pledge, committing to give at least 10% of my income to charity. I specifically focus on programs working in some of the lowest-income countries and on causes where small amounts of money can do a lot. The charity evaluator GiveWell is a good resource to find some of the most cost-effective causes to support.

This point on cost-effectiveness is particularly important to me in terms of personal donations, but it also matters when it comes to foreign aid. At the beginning of this article, I highlighted a number of successful aid programs: efforts to eradicate polio, reduce deaths from HIV and malaria, and provide food supplies during famine. It would be great if all aid money were as well-spent as this, but that’s not the reality. Some foreign aid is spent on programs and activities that make little difference. More than half of Brits think that aid is a complete waste due to corruption, and it’s these examples that can often make people sceptical that their dollars are being put to good use.

While I advocate for an increase in the foreign aid budget (and personal donations) overall, I’d also like to see a renewed focus on making sure that we’re spending this money in the best possible way. This would not only improve the outcomes for people who need this support but could also increase support for higher foreign aid budgets in rich countries.

When aid programs work well, they can transform the lives of millions. These programs are not designed to last forever; they’re there to support lower-income countries and kickstart self-fulfilling progress. Unfortunately, these stories of progress are not well-known. If we want to see a resurgence in support for foreign aid, we need to talk about them much more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

Curious to hear your thoughts about Chapter 7 of The Dictator's Handbook by Bueno de Mesquita and Smith.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Care to summarize if you're trying to make a point?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Not really. It's easy enough to find at the library, Libby, or PDF via Google search. Probably even archive.org has it. My question was intended for the author, anyway. I still recommend everyone find and read that book, though.

Edit: sorry for being snippy. I haven't eaten in 42 hours and I was about to be sedated for a medical procedure and my blood sugar is low and the book itself is really worth a read and I was worried I wouldn't do it justice with a brief rushed summary.

[–] Retropunk64@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You realize the author isn't OP, right?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't..sorry. I'll delete my comments.

[–] Retropunk64@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Nbd.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)