this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1212 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

34973 readers
118 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what's going on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cannot become a billionaire without being a scummy person.

[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Rowling became a billionaire by writing popular books and selling the movie rights. She's a scummy person, obviously, but she didn't become rich by being one.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah you definitely can become a billionaire without being a scummy person, just not trough business. You need to be an artist or athlete.

[–] Zana@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely not going to be a CEO without being a piece of shit. You need that lack of ethics to make it that high.

You can literally start your own company and assign yourself CEO. It's probably all of a filing fee away. It's easy to become a C-suite.

[–] dot20@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Which means you're born into a weird sociopathic upbringing. Very fee born into wealth see any issues with it and even then, it tends to be short lived. One of the Johnson and Johnson heirs put out a documentary, but not much after that.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

As you say, she's a scummy person, so you have no way of knowing that she only became a billionaire because of the books.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Most of the Harry Potter stories are stolen/copies of either existing young adult novels or existing mythology. There's very little original material or concepts. All writers borrow from other writers, but Rowling is just barely better than a plagiarist.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Rowling became a billionaire

Google says her net worth is £820 million. Not a billoonarrr.