this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
157 points (95.9% liked)

Games

33091 readers
1002 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The 4090 gets like sub 20fps without DLSS and stuff. Seems like a good improvement.

[–] kat@orbi.camp 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

50% improvement not enough for you?

[–] kat@orbi.camp 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not every game has frame gen.. not everybody wanna introduce lag to input. So 50% is 100% sketchy marketing. You can keep your 7 frames, Imma wait for 6090

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both figures are without DLSS, FG, whatever. Just native 4k with Path Tracing enabled, that's why it's so low.

The sketchy marketing is comparing a 5070 with a 4090, but that's not what this is about.

[–] kat@orbi.camp 1 points 1 day ago

Like I said, I base performance without frame gen. 5090 is not twice as powerful as a 4090, which they advertise, without frame gen.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)