this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
18 points (76.5% liked)

Linux

8308 readers
165 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
18
Btrfs should've been Wayland (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 month ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think the problem with btrfs is that it entered the spotlight way to early. With Wayland there was time to work on a lot of the kinks before everyone started seriously switching.

On btrfs a bunch of people switched blindly and then lost data. This caused many to have a bad impression of btrfs. These days it is significantly better but because there was so much fear there is less attention paid to it and it is less widely used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

@hummus273 Waypipe would involve a lot of userland / kernel exchanges avoided by using the kernel based mode setting Xserver. It happens to work well with my hardware. And I don't see any noticeable latency issues and not all apps work with Wayland hence I have no motivation to change to Wayland and every motivation to avoid it. Sorry if that gets someone's panties in a wad.

[–] hummus273@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Waypipe has nothing to do with the kernel mode setting driver. The X server code does not run in the kernel. Wayland compositors use kernel modesetting for mode changes, so not sure what your point is? Not saying you need to switch to Wayland, just saying that it covers the use case you described as impossible with Wayland.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@hummus273 Yes actually in my case it does. The kernel has an X-server built in but ONLY for Intel graphics and I happen to have Intel graphics. Sorry if you're not familiar enough with X or the kernel to know that but that is a fact.

[–] hummus273@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that is the case, then you can probably easily find the X server code in the Linux kernel and send a link? Spoiler: it is not there

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago

@hummus273 I am mistaken, it is only the mode setting for the X-server that is handled in the kernel. At any rate it works well for my needs.