this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
246 points (89.7% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2752 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (18 children)

How disappointing.

Renewables and storage are far superior, in almost every conceivable metric it’s not funny.

Yet we let conservatives hype up nuclear garbage and carbon recapture as the solution to climate change.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Still better than coal in every way.

[–] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Right so if you’re moving off of coal, the cheaper and better option (renewables) is the right move.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not really, not right now it isn't. If you want to cover baseload with wind and solar you'll need energy storage. We haven't got a solution that scales well, yet.

[–] MoistCircuits0698@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Base load isn't really a thing. This is the problem with pro nuclear. There isn't an understanding of the issue. Lets not talk about reaction time of fission plants.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Base load isn't really a thing.

How do you figure that?

This is the problem with pro nuclear. There isn't an understanding of the issue.

Is this an attempt at insult? If you believe that I have misunderstood something, then please enlighten me.

Lets not talk about reaction time of fission plants.

Agreed, let's leave that out of the equation, as then the only viable backup to solar and vind, using current technology, is burning stuff.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Renewables aren't baseline power, they're just unfit for purpose if not combined with nuclear or coal; all anti nuclear movements do is ensure the latter is used.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)