this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
-26 points (31.9% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29079 readers
186 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The shear amount of tankiness over on lemmy.ml is making me seriously consider leaving the platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Probably a good idea to fork Lemmy at some point.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have an account there too. Two problems for me there at the moment and they're both technical. I can't find a native mobile client for it (mobile web is ok but not ideal) and iirc it's written in PHP which is problematic. I think a reasonable answer is both.

[–] loreasaurus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is PHP problematic? It’s not a fantastic language, but it’s perfectly functional.

Source: 80% of my code base at work is in PHP

[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I guess just from my experience with system administration over a long time. I've seen many problems (security, maintainability) in implementations in PHP - maybe it's not the language but the projects which choose it? Anyway, that's the association it has for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)