this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
164 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2280 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with my comment.

Would you be okay if Israel's assets were seized and the money given to Palestinian resistance groups? Because I'm guessing you would. That would be the ethical thing to do.

Russia, obviously, is special to you. You're against the ethical thing in that case, despite Putin also committing genocide.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am against the United States being able to seize the assets of other countries, whether it be Russia or Israel or Egypt or anywhere else. The US does not have the right to be able to just seize somebody's assets. That's called theft. And theft is wrong.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That still has nothing to do with my comment. It's very dishonest of you keep evading what I'm talking about.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I answered your question. What more could you possibly want?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You did not. You talked about the U.S., not G7 as a whole. No one asked you about the U.S. The vast majority of seized assets have not been seized by the U.S.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, okay, I see. Well, regardless whether it's the US or Europe or whatever, I don't feel as though any country should have the right to seize another country's assets.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then what should be done with things like Russian oligarchs' yachts in foreign ports? They're taking up space that could be better utilized and the oligarchs aren't allowed to get them due to sanctions. Is it right to expect, for example, France to maintain some Russian billionaire's yacht docked in the harbor in Nice to maintain it indefinitely? That, of course, means that they have to make sure that it will not become a risk to the port in any way. That also means that French taxpayers are going to have to pay to maintain that yacht.

I don't see the logic there.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The oligarchs themselves can't go get it. That's for sure. But they can still pay somebody to go get it with assets they control such as gold or Bitcoin or Monero.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So your solution is to illegally get around the sanctions? Really? Sounds like a good reason for a navy to sink such a yacht as soon as it safely leaves port.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes because slaves with guns (the military) who take orders from gangsters (governmyth) should destroy someones property that was being illegally withheld from its owner.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Illegally held? I don't think you understand how international sanctions work. It's the opposite of illegal.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sanctions are illegal according to the non-aggression principle.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bananas are illegal according to the Flying Squid principle. So what? That's not how the world works no matter how much you want it to.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yet. I cant wait for governments to fail because taxation will become totally voluntary in future.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can I borrow your crystal ball? I'd like to see what next week's lotto numbers are!

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Weird. I didn't realize emojis granted psychic powers.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ya learn something new every day