this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17953 readers
50 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

FYI: if you are an active apologist for Stallman in this thread, you will be indefinitely banned from Beehaw. to the extent that Stallman has salient critiques of anything he's under fire for (as @t3rmit3@beehaw.org notes), his use of those critiques is almost exclusively to advance horrible, indefensible, actively harmful ideas. if you actually care about the merits of these subjects, nothing he argues is actually best argued from him. almost anybody else would be better served as a mouthpiece. and it is just incredibly silly to stand by the guy who took until 2019 to retract his belief that pedophilia isn't harmful to children just because, as a foundational belief informing that position, he reasonably thinks we infantilize people between the ages of 12 and 17 too much

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aside for all his pedophile view points, he is correct about infantilizing 12-17 year olds. We have helicopter parents removing every roadblock for children, they grow up not knowing how to plan or resolve conflict.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aside for all his pedophile view points, he is correct about infantilizing 12-17 year olds.

...you're just repeating my point back to me, and why Stallman is the worst mouthpiece for this position.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're adding to your point, not disagreeing.