206
submitted 6 days ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is probably the worst option. Judges should be professional and not populists pandering to the public.

[-] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 days ago

What? Democratically appointed judges? That’s amazing , wonder why the US hasn’t thought of this? Ohh right that’s because we give way too much power to the one in office. This is great for Mexico now the US needs to do this.

[-] iorale@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pssst, your ignorance is showing.

The civilians won't pick the candidates, the state will (different parts of it, but all of them under the control of Morena) and then they'll use the civilians to vote for them and then frame it as if it was the will of the people. You know, populism.

Also the narcos are REALLY happy about this change, because the candidates are going to need money to campaign and they could always use a hand in higher places (even if the president protects the narcos already).

it doesn't touch the police problem at all or the security problem, but it allows Morena to fill the magistrate with their people regardless of their studies, they can even put criminals in there (search for the history of any Morena member, they have murderers, thiefs, pedos and rapists).
Now tell me... What does this change fix? Besides "now people can vote for Morenas picks!".

[-] Truffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Mejor dicho, imposible. Yo aún tenía la esperanza de que la Suprema Corte de Justicia pudiera bloquear la reforma, pero está cañón con todo el arrastre que tiene M0rena.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
206 points (99.5% liked)

World News

32076 readers
869 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS