441
submitted 1 week ago by tsugu@slrpnk.net to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 53 points 1 week ago

Snap should be reason enough that everyone should abandon Ubuntu, especially when Mint is right there. The last thing we need is to make Linux more like Android+Google Play.

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 week ago

I politely disagree. Try to look at Snaps this way: Canonical maintains 16.04, 18.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04. Each with their own repos. Each has to be properly maintained. With snap they can release the package a single time, and it can be used across all of their releases. I think this is the main point of snap. Being able to use it across other systemd distros is just a bonus.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Why do they need to disrespect their users rights to that though?

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago

How does Canonical disrespect your rights?

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

They snap store is proprietary

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 week ago

So are the drivers your computer likely relies on. Are you willing to buy a thinkpad from 2005 and use a random FSF approved distro?

[-] airglow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Silly whataboutism. When there are multiple Linux package management solutions to choose from that are functional, decentralized, and fully FOSS, including ones that work across distros, switching to the proprietary Canonical-controlled Snap Store is moving backward for no good reason.

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago

I don't see how this matters.

Let's look at the very worst case possible scenario: Everyone abandons Flatpak and AppImage and moves to Snapcraft, and Canonical decides to make a decision that destroys the store.

You can still install FOSS apps from somewhere, at worst compile them.

All that would be lost if Snapcradt stopped existing are the proprietary apps, which you wouldn't use anyways.

[-] airglow@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's not the worst possible scenario, I'd love to see the Snap Store completely replaced with decentralized FOSS alternatives. Any scenario in which the Snap Store takes market share from decentralized FOSS alternatives is considerably worse.

Also, who said I wouldn't use proprietary apps? I refuse to use Snap because Flatpak and other FOSS application packaging solutions that aren't locked to a store controlled by a single for-profit company already serve my needs. I don't have any objection to using proprietary apps that don't have alternatives that meet my needs.

[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ubuntu benefited from an open community for years, and when it came time to create a solution for a problem, they chose to develop something and not share it with community that helped them get where they are now. That's a straight up asshole move.

[-] tsugu@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

I dare say that allowing any distro to use their repos is pretty generous, and gives back to the community. They have no obligation to open source Snapcraft's server, and snapd being able to install snaps locally is more than enough.

https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/download-snaps-and-install-offline/15713

[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

What an embarassingly obsequious viewpoint.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
441 points (87.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20704 readers
1767 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS