75
50 cents, 0 cents, 1 question: how much can fare cuts boost public transport use?
(theconversation.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
75 points (95.2% liked)
Fuck Cars
9603 readers
600 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You have speed, cost, and safety to contend with.
Cars are faster (direct to destination), cheaper for some trips (even including maintenance), and about equal in safety; more accidents, but much fewer muggings.
So, want to boost public transit? Start beating cars in those categories.
Speed - Making roads suck in order to prioritize public transit is a low blow and not giving this cause credibility. It's stirred up a ton of animosity. Cities have adopted a "can't win so let's be a dick" strategy. But where this can beat cars is high speed rail. As a car guy, I really look forward to that! Whoa, I know.
Cost - Make it all free. Seriously, it's public infrastructure. Pay for it with taxes. Our county already spends $150+ million a year making streets suck for a miniscule minority. Dump that crap into busses and light rail and we got ourselves a functioning town. Hell, the Bay Area already earmarked $1.4 TRILLION with a T for the next 25 years.
Safety - My female friends ALL have stories about public transport. They range from forced conversations, sexual comments, and even overhearing detaills of how the two men in the seat behind will attack her. Yeah, she drives everywhere now. Point is, safety has to be enforced and it hasn't had a good track record here. Not to mention there is a huge public service campaign right now plastering busses with banners that say "Human trafficking happens here".
facepalm
Yeah, that's the message you want to send...
So public transport, pick 2 of 3 categories and do better than cars and you'll attract riders. Oh, and stop being a jerk to everyone else pretty please with a cherry on top.
Car crashes are the leading cause of death in most places. Even if mugging were a realistic concern (not really), I would greatly prefer being mugged to being dead.
Would be interesting to control for volume. How many people per 100k cars are in an accident, minor or otherwise, vs how many people per 100k riders experience and assault or some other crime. In a rough neighborhood, the bus is not safe at all.