this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
487 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Intel says the rebranding “better aligns to customer requests” to simplify its processor names

But it doesn't simplify the processor name!? Instead of i5, we now have to say "core 5" or "intel core 5".

[–] SilverRetriever@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a feeling everyone's going to end up calling them i9s anyways

[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably. The "core" name is too close to the old "Core2Duo/Quad" names anyway.

[–] toadmode@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

They're probably not too worried about people getting them mixed up with 15 year old CPUs

load more comments (12 replies)