this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
231 points (97.1% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2614 readers
198 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (23 children)

As annoying as sovcits are, we can't conflate them with people just asserting their rights.

It's reasonable to require consent before performing tests/procedures on your children. (Though I, personally, would trust the nursing staff and doctors more than this.)

The behavior here is a hint of terrible sovcit / antivax shit, but it hasn't crossed the line yet, and shouldn't (alone) require CPS yet.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not saying that I agree or disagree, but why does the parents consent matter?

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Parental consent is usually used as a substitute where a child is too young to give consent for a procedure. In Australia and the UK once a child is able to understand the procedure and associated risks they are considered "Gillick competent" and their consent outweighs the parent's, but until then the parent is the one who gives consent on the child's behalf. Parental consent is also used as a substitute when the child is incapacitated by injury or illness such that they are incapable of giving informed consent. Health practitioners and first aiders can also assume consent in life-threatening situations where the patient is incapable of giving consent (e.g. giving CPR to someone in cardiac arrest).

load more comments (21 replies)