Where does the line get drawn, in your opinion, when it comes to Neurodivergent? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Subito@beehaw.org to c/neurodivergence@beehaw.org

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This post isn't to exclude anyone or anything, I'm just curious how people understand the term.

People who identify themselves as neurodivergent typically have one or more of the conditions or disorders listed below. However, since there aren’t any medical criteria or definitions of what it means to be neurodivergent, other conditions also can fall under this term as well. People with these conditions may also choose not to identify themselves as neurodivergent.

Autism spectrum disorder (this includes what was once known as Asperger’s syndrome).

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). [...]

I think, as someone who was diagnosed with ADD when young and Asperger's in my 20's, the term applies. But I'd much rather be called Neurodivergent than other labels, if I had to pick one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To me, my idea of neurodivergence is that it's a more neutral term what we'd typically call neurodevelopmental disorders, and could potentially be extended to personality disorders. Neurodivergent people are those with (typically) lifelong differences in brain function. I think it's a helpful concept at times but I also think it's far too vague and more specific diagnoses exist for a reason.

I'm torn on including personality disorders because on one hand, they feel more squarely problematic (particularly as someone whose mother is Borderline), but on the other, it's possible that "feeling squarely problematic" is influenced a whole lot by culture and personal opinion. I've experienced being judged by other people's shitty personal opinions too often to feel comfortable doing it with other people.

[-] Subito@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I completely see where you're coming from with the idea of including personality disorders because of that "feeling squarely problematic" definition. Drawing on some personal experience, I don't personally view myself as having a clearcut case of Asperger's because 1) it was never severe enough to be a huge problem and 2) it was diagnosed after I was already an adult, by one psychiatrist (out of many).

Saying to someone "I'm considered neurodivergent" makes more sense to me than saying "I might be on the Autism Spectrum, depending on who you ask."

Good insight!

[-] turninggears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Saying to someone “I’m considered neurodivergent” makes more sense to me than saying “I might be on the Autism Spectrum, depending on who you ask.”

I think there's also a lot of liminal space inbetween different diagnoses where people might otherwise need to say "I might have ADHD or maybe I'm autistic, or maybe both, but it's hard to say" and "I'm neurodivergent" might be a frankly more useful way to describe the situation.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023

2 points (100.0% liked)