this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
146 points (96.8% liked)

Open Source

31129 readers
297 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am very new to linux and all the open source stuff (my first post on lemmy actually) so I don't get how this stuff works but flathub is saying that floorp is proprietary. But after a quick google search it says that floorp is open source licensed under MPL 2.0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

without actually giving back any code to the commons

Can you explain how this works?

Say a contributer downloads v1.1 of floorp, checks the code and makes a PR. Floop sees this and accepts the change and publishes v1.2. If a new contributer downloads floorp, they get v1.2 where they can see the previous merged PR.

How is it that they are not giving back? I can understand that not being on a repository makes it difficult but it's technically possible.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The contribution is automatically relicensed under that licence and as such, it remains property of the org that made floorp, so they're technically getting free labour, support and maintenance

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like bsd with extra steps

[–] Persi@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

It's way worse.

With bsd you could at least take the code you got and make your own fork, with these shared source licenses you get nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)