1270
submitted 3 months ago by federino@programming.dev to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think this post massively overestimates the power a CEO has. The CEO is beholden to the shareholders. Valve is private, ~~so~~ and its shareholders are its workers. It would be useful to know how many shares Gaben has of valve, but I still don't think the next CEO would suddenly also be the majority owner.

Also, I know things have changed a lot in the last 12 years, but 12 years ago regarding the total dissolution of Valve, Gaben said:

“It’s way more likely we would head in that direction than say, ‘Let’s find some giant company that wants to cash us out and wait two or three years to have our employment agreements terminate."

Also, forcing users onto windows is THE way to kill valve's profits. The whole point of the Linux push was a direct response to the windows store, and msft's threat of forcing valve to give them a cut of purchase through steam. Msft will still do that the first chance it gets. So even the most profit-minded new leader wouldn't make that choice, as it's plainly shortsighted.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Also Valve isn't the charity they believe it is. It's a de-facto monopoly, and it has serious moderation issues (basically if you bought enough games, they will less likely ban you for hatespeech and such).

[-] Rossel@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago

Valve isn't pulling any anticompetitive moves though. They just try to secure profits by being the best instead of destroying everyone else that dares to compete with them.

[-] FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Valve isn't pulling any anticompetitive moves though.

Well, they are allegedly forcing price parity on publishers, so they can't sell cheaper on their own website or some other storefront that takes smaller cuts. That's anticompetitive as shit, and they are being sued over it.

[-] Rossel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That parity thing was debunked 2 years ago when a similar lawsuit against Valve was dismissed, their parity thing is for resold Steam keys, which Valve issues with no profit margin. Milberg London are trolls that tried to do the same lawsuit against Sony and PlayStation last year. Also got nowhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
1270 points (97.1% liked)

Steam

8517 readers
3 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS