this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
655 points (96.6% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2451 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah, and now the dishonesty. That is not what people mean when they say a blanket ban on travel and I'm sure you're not stupid, so you know that.

There's a reason that the AP article linked above doesn't use that term in this case.

What is there to address about the blanket ban?

I don't know, how about something like, "okay, I didn't mean 'blanket ban,' that was wrong of me."

But, of course, this is the internet and admitting your wrong is the worst thing ever, so I won't be holding my breath.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Haha what? They're banning all Israeli passport holders. Do you have some special definition of "blanket ban" that you manipulate to suit your purposes?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Uhh yeah OK, congrats on winning this argument based on your made-up definition of "blanket ban". Go ahead and celebrate with Donald Trump, who wanted to enact the same against muslim-majority coountries.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What are you even talking about?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You linked me to a page where the word 'blanket' is never used?

I mean you could have done a quick control-F like I did...

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Here's one on the same topic with "blanket": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13769

What definition of "blanket ban" are you using here? This is a pretty good one, I think:

A ban that applies to or affects all or the majority of a given class of people or things.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a little late to start to expect me to use your sources when you're so against admitting you're wrong that you couldn't even admit the fact that your link didn't actually support your claim.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Am I being pranked here? This conversation is absolutely bonkers.