this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
839 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59695 readers
2569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Right. If you put in enough chargers, ranges of 300 to 400mi are fine. You need to stop every 2 to 4 hours, anyway, so it's not a big deal in practice.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stopping every 2 hours is nuts. 4 hours sure ok. I regularly drive long distances for work and if it's 6 hours or less I'm going to try to make it without stopping at all.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're harming yourself doing this. First, sitting for long periods of time isn't good, and getting up and stretching every 2 hours is recommended. This applies to office work just as much as driving. Second, urination typically happens every 3-4 hours, and if you're not, then you're likely dehydrated or have something else going wrong.

If you really, really want to do this, well OK, but we shouldn't put the whole EV transition on hold just to let you do this.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah nothing's going to stop me and I do far worse things for my health. You're right though.

And yeah I was just commenting on the two hour thing which I thought seemed silly. Nothing to do with the original topic of EVs.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's not a big deal if you're only driving a few hours. Longer trips, especially business trips, yes that's a big deal.

Not to mention, the real world tests don't support the stated driving ranges for most models. Ideal conditions hardly ever exist in the real world.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the real world, people don't regularly drive 600 miles in a hurry either.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Most people don't, but some do. I did for a while, when I was working as a construction manager and then again as a generator technician. It's a big country, with all kinds of people. I think you'd be surprised how many people frequently need to drive ling distances in a hurry.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I'm sure there are people, but I think you'd be surprised how few there are. The vast majority of people make long trips very infrequently - to the point that most could hire a car or find some other means for those situations.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but if only those people who need that drove ICE cars, BEVs would have a 90% market share.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but first you have to make an EV that 90% of people can afford. And make enough of them for 90% of the market to buy. And maybe do something about interest rates while we're at it. Also, I could use a back rub. And world peace, maybe.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Best I can do is a 12-year financing plan at 18% interest and oh, you're fired.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

I get more than the stated range in the summer and less in the winter.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it's a business trip where time matters where you can't afford to loose 25 minutes every few hours, why are you driving instead of flying?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because planes won't drop you off at the client's house, even when you ask nicely.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

But it's still going to be fast (and cheaper with wages factored in) to fly while using one of the countless 'last mile transportation' options available when the distance is greater than an EVs range while you can't afford to loose time to charging. The only exceptions I see is those jobs who need tools/supplies on site in which case you are almost definitely taking a fleet vehicle and this whole problem is moop.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I appreciate you trying to problem solve someone else's job so that your preferred solution makes sense, but have you considered that maybe you don't have all the answers?

Flights aren't cheap.

Contractors pay for their own transport.

Contractors aren't hourly.

Most small businesses don't have "fleets."

The "last mile" could be 6 hours from the nearest commercial airport.

Direct flights don't always go where you need them to go or leave at convenient times.

You're right about needing tools and supplies which was another reason flying was a non-starter, but a car is also a place where you can sleep in a pinch. If a job takes longer than expected, you might not be near a hotel, much less a charging station.

There are a lot of reasons I don't do those jobs anymore, and I love working from home now. Less than a year ago, I looked for an EV or PHEV that I could afford and would fit four people and a dog. There weren't any. That was my original thesis, that the cars are still too rare and too expensive for mass adoption. Charging networks are a sub-problem that requires attention, but fixing it won't fix the primary issue.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your thesis is fundamentally flawed though because you are taking your situation and extrapolating to the public as a whole. While I'll agree the market for new EVs is stupid right now the used market is far from. I say that writing this from my 22' model 3 I paid 18k for used. And that price wasn't a fluke.

I'd also like to add the last mile transportation I was referring to isn't public transport or some ride share app but the industry of van drivers who specialize in business transport. Companies like PTI or Halcon who specialize in getting you from anywhere to anywhere.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't pay $18k for a model 3 regardless, but that's still a price that is out of reach for the vast majority of people buying a car. I believe you are taking your financial situation and assuming it represents the public as a whole.

And if you think most people driving to work can afford a paid transport, that just reinforces the previous point. You're completely out of touch.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The avarage used car loan in the United States is 26k. That price is not "out of reach for the vast majority of people buying used cars".

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The average is not the median, and there's about 20% of the population living below the poverty line that can't qualify for a car loan. If you exclude the top 10% that can afford much higher loans, that average goes way down.