this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
835 points (91.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
421 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 14 points 7 months ago (29 children)

    I would hapilly use linux mint if only it didn't use apt, honestly don't like it as a package manager.

    Ghere is also the fact that mint will have older versions of packages, for example neovim which I need to be latest version always.

    That's why I loved arch and gentoo before, for their package managers and roling distro nature.

    Now I'm on nixos unstable and it's currently my favourite unbreakable distro, and the nix package manager is really good and making my own pqckages is really easy.

    [โ€“] Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    I don't like apt too as much. But, interface-wise, you can make it way better with Nala, which is a frontend for it.

    NixOS is too complicated and demanding for most users, who aren't programmers or hobbyists, imo.
    I prefer Fedora Atomic. It has the same pros (unbreakable, highly configurable with universal-blue.org, etc.) but feels way more user friendly.
    I use it with Distrobox on top, so I can use my package manager/ distro of choice (turned out to be Arch btw) on a extremely reliable system.

    For your case, you can replicate Mint by just installing the Cinnamon image from uBlue and applying some minimal tweaks.
    Then you get the user friendliness from Mint with the flexibility and unbreakability from NixOS. Do you like the idea? Just in case you get annoyed by NixOS in the future ๐Ÿ™ƒ

    [โ€“] TheFadingOne@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

    I don't think OSTree systems can quite reach the flexibility of NixOS. For instance with NixOS (with direnv and nix-shells) you can essentially swap out your running system based on the different directories you enter and I think that's still just scraping the top of the iceberg. From my experience with OSTree (which is admittedly somewhat limited) I don't think you can reach that level of flexibility.

    It's still really cool, I don't mean to shit on that, I'm just saying NixOS and OSTree have different pros and cons and use cases.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (27 replies)