Like I told you, I dont care about what a corrupt judge has to say, I care about the actual facts and what happens in real estate transactions. The worst thing I have heard (and I have heard it multiple times) is that they said the square footage was different than reality, is this the worst thing he did? If not be very specific on somethings worse. If it is the worst thing, then it doesnt change the value much, and would be caught in underwriting. And again, who was the actual party that was harmed?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I dont care about what a corrupt judge has to say, I care about the actual facts

Those are in the decision.

The worst thing I have heard (and I have heard it multiple times) is that they said the square footage was different than reality, is this the worst thing he did?

No, it's a single example, I've quoted other points above.

If not be very specific on somethings worse.

Already did, in the past above, and the rest is in the decision, very clearly spelled out.

And again, who was the actual party that was harmed?

That's also in the quoted bit, bold for your convenience and you still didn't read it.

I'm starting to seriously if you're just ignoring everything or if you have serious reading comprehension problem. Or maybe it's hard denial of everything you don't like? All your questions have already been addressed.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please look into "Underwriting" and then get back to me.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Done (as said before). What's your point by repeating this?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I repeat it because underwriting is the thing that makes everythng that is claimed to be irrelevant. If you need another opinion, just listen to Kevin Oleary talk about this, or any number of other people that do real estate.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

listen to Kevin Oleary talk about this

The guy who absolutely rips into everyone who dares overvalue their invention by 2 cents on Shark Tank?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I dont watch the show, but I am going to assume he does that. As a person that finds trump annoying, and am not going to vote for him, and has been involved in dozens of real estate purchases and sales, this whole case is such a load of crap that its hard to describe what a miscarriage of justice this is. I would recommend you actually listen to someone like Kevin Oleary talk about this because he will give a lot longer more detailed explanation becuase its not in text form.